If shares are registered in your name and you execute a proxy but either (i) indicate when voting on the Internet or by telephone that you wish to vote as recommended by the Board or (ii) sign and return a proxy card without providing specific voting instructions, the shares will be voted:


1.	“FOR” each of the ~~six~~five nominees for Director listed in this Proxy Statement;


2.	“FOR” approval of the amended and restated 2006 Stock Incentive Plan; and


3.	“FOR” the ratification of KPMG LLP as Pixelworks’ independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, ~~2016; and~~


4.	~~“FOR” the proposal regarding an advisory vote on executive compensation;~~2017.

Shares Registered in the Name of Broker, Bank or Other Agent

If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank or other agent, you should have received a proxy card and voting instructions with these proxy materials from that organization. Simply complete and mail the proxy card to ensure that your vote is counted. Alternatively, you may vote by telephone or over the Internet as instructed by your broker, bank or other agent. To vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank or other agent. Follow the instructions from your broker, bank or other agent included with these proxy materials, or contact your broker, bank or other agent to request a valid proxy.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank or other agent and you do not provide specific voting instructions to your broker, bank or other agent, under the rules of certain securities exchanges, including the NASDAQ rules, the broker, bank or other agent holding those shares may generally vote as the nominee determines in its discretion on behalf of the beneficial owner on routine matters, but cannot vote on non-routine matters, the latter of which results in “broker non-votes.” We understand that, under NASDAQ rules, proposals one ~~two~~ and ~~four~~two involve non-routine matters, and without your instruction, your broker cannot vote your shares. Accordingly, broker non-votes are expected. No broker non-votes are expected for proposal three as it involves matters we believe to be routine. See “ — Effect of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes,” below.

Revocability of Proxy

You can revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the Annual Meeting. You may revoke your proxy in any one of three ways:


1.	A duly executed proxy card with a later date or time than the previously submitted proxy;


2.	A written notice that you are revoking your proxy sent to our Secretary, care of Pixelworks, Inc., 224 Airport Parkway, Ste. 400, San Jose, CA 95110; or


3.	A later-dated vote by telephone or Internet or a ballot cast in person at the Annual Meeting (simply attending the Meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy).

Quorum

A quorum is required for the shareholders to conduct business at the Annual Meeting. The presence, in person or by proxy, of a majority of the total number of outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions, broker non-votes and other proxies received but not marked, if any, will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the Annual Meeting for quorum purposes.

Votes Required to Adopt Proposals

Each outstanding share of our common stock on the record date is entitled to one vote on each of the ~~six~~five Director nominees and one vote on each other matter. Our Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the shares entitled to vote in the matter. This means that the ~~six~~five nominees for Director receiving the most affirmative votes will be elected. Approval of other matters requires that the majority of the votes cast “for” the matter exceed the number of votes cast “against” the matter.

Effect of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes

Abstentions, broker non-votes and shares not present at the meeting are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists at the Annual Meeting, but have no effect on the results of voting. If you are a beneficial holder and do not provide specific voting instructions to your broker, bank or other agent, the organization that holds your shares will not be authorized to vote on the election of Directors or approval of the amended and restated 2006 Stock Incentive ~~Plan or the advisory vote on executive compensation.~~Plan.

Expenses and Solicitation

The Company will bear the cost of this solicitation. Our Directors, officers, and other employees, without additional compensation, may also solicit proxies personally or in writing, by telephone, email, or otherwise. We are required to request that brokers and nominees who hold stock in their names furnish our proxy materials to the beneficial owners of the stock, and we must reimburse these brokers and nominees for the expenses of doing so in accordance with statutory fee schedules. At this time, we have not engaged a proxy solicitor. If we do engage a proxy solicitor, we will pay the customary costs associated with such engagement.

Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials

Any shareholder may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis. Choosing to receive future proxy materials by email will save the Company the cost of printing and mailing documents to shareholders and will reduce the impact of annual meetings on the environment. A shareholder who chooses to receive future proxy materials by email will receive an email prior to next year’s annual meeting with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting website. A shareholder’s election to receive proxy materials by email will remain in effect until the shareholder terminates it. You may request to receive proxy materials by email by entering the control number provided on your proxy card at www.investordelivery.com or www.proxyvote.com.

Householding of Proxy Materials

We are “householding” our proxy materials pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules. This procedure allows the Company to reduce its printing costs, mailing costs and fees by delivering one copy of our annual report and Proxy Statement to multiple shareholders who share the same mailing address, unless the Company received contrary instructions from an affected shareholder.

We will promptly deliver upon written or oral request a separate copy of this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 to any shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of any of these documents was delivered. To request a separate copy of any of these documents, shareholders may write or call the Company at our principal executive offices:

Pixelworks, Inc.

Attn: Secretary

224 Airport Parkway, Ste. 400

San Jose, CA 95110

(408) 200-9200

Shareholders of record who would like to revoke householding consent and receive a separate copy of proxy materials, and shareholders sharing an address and receiving multiple copies of proxy materials who would like to give householding consent and request delivery of a single copy of these documents, should contact Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., either by calling toll free at (800) 579-1639 or by writing to Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. Within 30 days of receipt of revocation of a shareholder’s consent, the shareholder will be removed from the householding program. If you hold your shares in street name, please contact your bank, broker or other holder of record to request information about householding.

PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Sixth Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended by the First, Second and Third Amendments thereto, and our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws provide that the number of members of the Board shall not be less than three or more than twelve with the exact number to be fixed by resolution of the Board. Our Sixth Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws require that our Board be divided into three classes serving staggered terms when the authorized number of Directors is fixed at eight or more, and if the authorized number of Directors is fixed at seven or less, the Directors shall hold office until the earlier of the next annual meeting of shareholders, a successor being elected and qualified, or such member's resignation, death or removal.

~~In 2012, our Board was divided into three classes serving staggered terms when the Board increased the size of the Board to nine members. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the~~The authorized number of Directors is currently set at ~~eight (8), and we have the following classes of Directors:~~

~~Class I: Three-year term expiring at the earlier of the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, a successor being elected and qualified, or such member’s resignation, death or removal.~~

~~Class II: Three-year term expiring at the earlier of the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, a successor being elected and qualified, or such member’s resignation, death or removal.~~

~~Class III: Three-year term expiring at the earlier of the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, a successor being elected and qualified, or such member’s resignation, death or removal.~~

~~Prior to the date of this Proxy Statement, on April 6, 2016, the Board appointed Todd A. DeBonis, our Chief Operating Officer, to the Board as a Class II Director.~~

~~On April 6, 2016~~five (5) members. , Directors Mark A. Christensen and Barry L. Cox notified the Board that each would resign, and would not stand for re-election, at the 2016 Annual Meeting, such resignation and refusal to stand for re-election to be effective on the date of the 2016 Annual Meeting, as of immediately prior to the commencement of the Annual Meeting. Following receipt of such notice, on ~~April 6, 2016~~, the Directors voted to decrease the authorized number of Directors to six (6), effective immediately following the effectiveness of the resignations of Mr. Christensen and Mr. Cox, and immediately prior to the commencement of the Annual Meeting. Because at the time of our Annual Meeting, our Board will consist of seven or less members, our Sixth Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws require that each Director hold office until the earlier of the next annual meeting of shareholders, a successor being elected and qualified, or such member's resignation, death or removal. In light of these events, theThe Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee recommended to the Board on ~~April 6, 2016~~, that each of Todd A. DeBonis, ~~Stephen L. Domenik,~~ C. Scott Gibson, Daniel J. Heneghan, Richard L. Sanquini and David J. Tupman be nominated for reelection to serve as Directors of the Company until the next annual meeting of shareholders. Additionally, on April 6, 2016, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee recommended, and the Board approved, certain changes to the composition of the Board committees, to take effect simultaneously with the decrease in the size of the Board, such changes as reflected in the table below.

In the event these ~~six~~five nominees for Director are re-elected, following the Annual Meeting, our Board would consist of the following individuals.



Name	Age	Committees
Todd A. DeBonis	51	~~None~~
~~Stephen L. Domenik~~	6452	None
C. Scott Gibson	6364	Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance and Nominating
Daniel J. Heneghan	6061	Audit (Chair) and Corporate Governance and Nominating
Richard L. Sanquini*	8182	Audit and Compensation (Chair)
David J. Tupman	5354	Compensation and Corporate Governance and Nominating (Chair)


*	Chairman of the Board

The proxies given to the proxy holders will be voted or not voted as directed and, if no direction is given, will be voted FOR the ~~six~~five nominees. If any nominee is unable or declines to serve as ~~director~~Director at the time of the Annual Meeting, an event not now anticipated, proxies will be voted for any nominee designated by our Board to fill the vacancy.

Director Nominees for Election

In accordance with SEC regulations, the names of the nominees and certain biographical information about the nominees, including the ~~director’s~~Director’s business experience, director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, information regarding involvement in certain legal or administrative proceedings, if applicable, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee to recommend that the nominee should serve on our Board, are set forth below. For additional information about how we identify and evaluate nominees for Director, see " — Qualifications of Directors."

TODD A. DEBONIS has served as our Chief ~~Operating~~Executive Officer and as a Director since ~~February~~April 2016, and previously served as our Chief Operating Officer from February 2016 to April 2016, and as our Executive Vice President, Sales, Marketing & Business Development from January 2016 to February 2016. Prior to joining Pixelworks, Mr. DeBonis served as the Vice President of Global Sales & Strategic Development at TriQuint Semiconductor, a semiconductor company, from April 2004 to December 2015, where his responsibilities included global sales, business development, strategic planning, customer support, contract negotiation and corporate marketing. Prior to TriQuint, Mr. DeBonis served as Vice President of Worldwide Sales & Marketing at Centillium Communications, a designer, developer and supplier of integrated programmable SoC solutions, Vice President of Worldwide Sales of Ishoni Networks, a silicon and software solution provider, and also held executive positions at Infineon Technologies, VisCom Corporation and Electec SoCal. Mr. DeBonis also serves on the Board of Directors of Poet Technologies Inc. (TSX VENTURE: PTK). Mr. DeBonis received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering with a focus in digital design and control systems from the University of Nevada.

Mr. DeBonis’ leadership and in-depth knowledge of the operations of the Company contribute to informed decision-making at the Board level. In addition, his prior experience as an executive at complementary semiconductor companies provides him with critical analysis and decision-making skills, deep relationships within our industry and knowledge of best-practices across the key functions of an organization.

~~STEPHEN L. DOMENIK~~ has served as Interim Chief Executive Officer of Pixelworks since February 2016 and has served as a Director of Pixelworks since August 2010. From January 2013 through December 2013, Mr. Domenik served as a consultant to Pixelworks. Since 1995, he has been a General Partner with Sevin Rosen Funds, a venture capital firm. Mr. Domenik has served as a director of MoSys, Inc. (NASDAQ: MOSY), a publicly traded fabless semiconductor company since June 2012, and a director of EMCORE Corporation (NASDAQ: EMKR), a publicly traded provider of compound semiconductor-based components and subsystems since December 2013. Mr. Domenik currently sits on the board of one privately held company. Mr. Domenik previously served as Chairman of the Board of Meru Networks, Inc., a publicly traded provider of wireless local area networks, until it was acquired by Fortinet, Inc. in May 2015. Mr. Domenik also served on the Board of Directors of NetLogic Microsystems, Inc., a publicly traded fabless semiconductor company from January 2001 until it was acquired by Broadcom Corporation in February 2012, and PLX Technology, Inc., a publicly traded semiconductor company from December 2013 until it was acquired by Avago Technologies Limited in August 2014. Mr. Domenik holds a B.S. in Physics and M.S.E.E. from the University of California at Berkeley.

During his tenure at Sevin Rosen Funds, Mr. Domenik led numerous investments in private companies and his service on the boards of EMCORE, Meru, MoSys, NetLogic and PLX, provides him with considerable relevant experience in the strategic development of high technology companies such as Pixelworks.

C. SCOTT GIBSON has served as a Director of Pixelworks since May 2002 and currently serves on public company boards as his full time professional job. From January 1983 through February 1992, Mr. Gibson co-founded and served as President, and Co-CEO of Sequent Computer Systems, Inc., a computer systems company. Prior to co-founding Sequent, Mr. Gibson served as General Manager, Memory Components Operation, at Intel Corporation. Since March 1992, Mr. Gibson served as a Director for several high technology companies. Mr. Gibson is currently ~~Chairman of the Board of RadiSys Corporation (NASDAQ: RSYS), and~~ serves on the Board of Directors of RadiSys Corporation (NASDAQ: RSYS), Northwest Natural Gas Company (NYSE: NWN) and Qorvo, Inc. (NASDAQ: QRVO). Within the past five years, Mr. Gibson also served on the Board of Directors of Verigy (NASDAQ: VRGY) and TriQuint Semiconductor, which subsequently merged with RF Micro Devices, Inc., and became Qorvo, Inc. in January 2015. Mr. Gibson serves as Trustee of the St. John's Medical Center, and the Community Foundation of Jackson Hole. Mr. Gibson holds a B.S.E.E. and an M.B.A. from the University of Illinois. Mr. Gibson was awarded the NACD Board Fellow credential in January 2017.

Mr. Gibson's semiconductor expertise and experience in the high-technology industry provide him with a deep understanding of our business. Mr. Gibson's significant experience as a director of other public companies provides him with a current working knowledge of business and economic trends that affect our industry. Mr. Gibson's prior experience co-founding and leading Sequent Computer Systems, along with other senior management positions he has held, provide him with insight into a range of issues that face Pixelworks. Through his board experience, Mr. Gibson has worked extensively with compensation consultants, and has gained a thorough knowledge of executive compensation trends and practices. Additionally, Mr. Gibson’s extensive work on public and non-profit audit committees, and his qualification as an audit committee financial expert as defined by SEC rules, lends perspective and experience to our Audit Committee.

DANIEL J. HENEGHAN has served as a Director of Pixelworks since April 2006. Mr. Heneghan currently serves as an advisor to the semiconductor industry. From 1999 to 2005, he served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Intersil Corporation, a world leader in the design and manufacture of high performance analog solutions. From 1980 to 1999, Mr. Heneghan worked in various management positions in finance, information technology, purchasing and operations for Harris Corporation, an international communications and information technology company serving government and commercial markets, including the position of Vice President and Controller of Harris Semiconductor Corporation, which he held from 1996 until leaving the company. ~~Since February 2006,~~ Mr. Heneghan ~~has~~ served on the board of directors of NTELOS Holdings Corp. ~~(NASDAQ: NTLS), a provider of wireless communication services.~~from February 2006 until it was acquired by Shenandoah Telecommunications in May 2016. Mr. Heneghan also served on the Board of Directors of Micrel, Inc. from November 2008, until it was acquired by by Microchip Technology in August, 2015. Mr. Heneghan also served on the Board of Directors for Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. from July 2010 until it was acquired by NXP Semiconductors in December 2015. Mr. Heneghan is a graduate of Quincy University with a B.S. in accounting. Mr. Heneghan also earned an M.B.A. from Western Illinois University.

Mr. Heneghan’s role as an advisor to the semiconductor industry brings the Company access to relationships with key industry participants and a current working knowledge of practices and developments in the industry. Additionally, Mr. Heneghan has experience directly managing companies that are complementary to, and face similar issues to those faced by Pixelworks. His leadership experience extends to financial and information technology oversight of large companies, which makes him particularly well suited to work with the Company on risk management and oversight. Mr. Heneghan’s service on the audit committee of other publicly traded companies provides him with significant experience with financial and accounting developments.

RICHARD L. SANQUINI has served as a Director of Pixelworks since February 2010. For the past several years, Mr. Sanquini has worked as an industry consultant, investor, and board director with young companies and has a strong reputation for helping to build and prepare them for public offering and/or acquisition. In addition to Pixelworks, Mr. Sanquini currently serves on the boards of Synaptics Incorporated (NASDAQ: SYNA), a developer and supplier of custom designed human interface solutions, R2 Semiconductor Inc., a privately-held fabless semiconductor company, and Keyssa, Inc., a privately-held developer of wireless technology for data ~~transfer, while also consulting with LitePoint, a developer of wireless testing solutions and wholly-owned subsidiary of Teradyne.~~transfer. Mr. Sanquini has also served as a director on many successful startup company boards during the last few years, including serving as the Chairman of PortalPlayer, the company that developed the silicon and operating system for the Apple iPod. Prior to his current role, Mr. Sanquini worked at National Semiconductor, initially as vice president of microprocessors, microcontrollers, and peripherals' with subsequent roles of senior vice president of the consumer and commercial division and as the company’s chief technology officer. He began his career at RCA’s Solid State Electronics Division, as an integrated circuit design engineer and eventually served as the general manager and director of memories and microprocessors. Mr. Sanquini holds a BSEE from the Milwaukee School of Engineering, Wisconsin.

Mr. Sanquini’s experience in senior management positions and his experience with intellectual property protection and China operations, provide him with specific knowledge that is valuable to the Board’s understanding of our business. His current service on complementary public company boards allows him to draw on experiences and knowledge from across the industry, and enables him to identify best practices and developments. Mr. Sanquini has served as a chairman and member of the audit and compensation committees, and as a member of the nominations and corporate governance committees, of other public company boards, which supports his knowledge of corporate governance trends and regulatory requirements.

DR. DAVID J. TUPMAN has served as a Director of Pixelworks since April 2014 and as a consultant to Pixelworks since July 2012. ~~Mr.~~Dr. Tupman is currently the CEO of Details Lab Inc., an advisory firm focusing on scaling organizations for high-growth, technology development and new product introduction. Since July 2015, ~~Mr.~~Dr. Tupman has also served on the Board of Directors of Cirrus Logic Inc. (NASDAQ: CRUS). From 2001 to 2011, ~~Mr.~~Dr. Tupman rose from manager to Vice President of hardware engineering at Apple, Inc., where he led the hardware engineering and technology teams for multiple mobile devices, including the iPhone and iPod devices. Prior to Apple, ~~Mr.~~Dr. Tupman worked at Psion Computers in London, England from 1995 to 2001 as a hardware-engineering manager where he developed a number of PDAs including the Psion Series 5MX and the Revo. From 1988 to 1995, ~~Mr.~~Dr. Tupman was a Principal Design Engineer at Schlumberger in Farnborough, England where he developed low power, high precision sensors for the gas, fuel and aerospace industries. ~~Mr.~~Dr. Tupman holds a Bachelors in Electronics Engineering from University of Salford, ~~England. Mr.~~England, where he also received an honorary Doctor of Science degree in 2014. Dr. Tupman is named as an inventor on more than 30 U.S. patents.

~~Mr.~~Dr. Tupman brings over 25 years of engineering and technology experience in the consumer electronics and industrial markets, which we believe will provide valuable insights and industry expertise to our Board.

Required Vote

Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting where a quorum is present. This means the ~~six director~~five Director nominees who receive the highest number of “for” votes properly cast will be elected as ~~directors,~~Directors, even if none receive a majority of the votes cast. Shareholders may not cumulate their votes. Because ~~directors~~Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes, an “abstain” vote will have no effect on the outcome of the election but will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present‎. In addition, a "withheld" vote will not be counted in determining the number of votes cast for the ~~director~~Director nominees.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF ITS NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR.

INFORMATION ABOUT OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Board Responsibilities

The Board is governed by our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which can be found on our website at www.pixelworks.com. The Board’s primary responsibilities include:

Understanding the factors that determine the Company’s success and the risks and problems that affect it;

Understanding, reviewing, approving and overseeing fundamental business strategies, financial strategies and major corporate actions;

Nominating Directors, reviewing the structure and operation of the Board and overseeing effective corporate governance;

Establishing a corporate environment that promotes timely and effective disclosure, financial accountability, high ethical standards and compliance with all applicable laws and regulations;

Understanding the results of operations and financial condition of the Company;

Evaluating the performance of the Company’s senior executives and taking action where appropriate;

Approving the compensation of the Company’s senior executives and overseeing succession planning for these executives; and

Providing advice and assistance to the Company’s senior executives.

Board Structure

Our Board currently consists of eight Directors and is divided into three classes serving staggered terms. At the time of the Annual Meeting, our Board will consist of six Directors serving one-year terms. Additional details regarding our Director classes and the declassification of our Board, are provided above in “Proposal No. 1: Election offive Directors.” The current Board members include ~~six~~four independent Directors ~~one member of our senior management~~ and our ~~Interim CEO.~~Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"). The Board believes that if all ~~six~~five nominees for Director are elected at the Annual Meeting, following the Annual Meeting there will be a majority of independent Directors on the Board.

Board Leadership Structure

Both independent and management Directors, including our ~~Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”),~~CEO, are eligible for appointment as Chairman of the Board. Currently, the functions of Chairman of the Board and the CEO are separated. Among the duties of the Chairman of the Board is the management of the Board, including prioritizing current matters in front of the Board and setting the agenda for meetings with the input of management. Mr. Sanquini has served as Chairman of the Board since July 2010. The CEO manages the Company and is accountable for corporate performance. Mr. ~~Domenik~~DeBonis has served as ~~Interim~~ CEO and President of Pixelworks ~~since February 2016~~ and has served on the Board since ~~August 2010.~~April 2016.

While both independent and management Directors are currently eligible to serve as Chairman of the Board, the Board believes that there may be advantages to having an independent Chairman of the Board for matters such as facilitating communications between the Board, the CEO, and other senior management and assisting the Board in reaching consensus on particular strategies and policies.

Director Independence

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a majority of our ~~directors~~Directors will be independent. The Board affirmatively determines the independence of each Director and nominee for election as a Director in accordance with the elements of independence set forth in applicable NASDAQ and SEC rules. Periodically and no less than annually, the Board conducts a review of Director independence, which includes a review of all relevant transactions, if any, or relationships between each Director or any of his or her family members and the Company, any member of our senior management or our independent registered public accounting firm. Based on this review and the review and recommendation by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board affirmatively determined all of our Directors, except ~~Stephen L. Domenik, our Interim CEO, and~~ Todd A Debonis, our ~~Chief Operating Officer,~~CEO, are independent as defined by the applicable rules of the SEC and NASDAQ and have no current relationship with the Company, except as a Director and shareholder. In addition, all Compensation Committee members are “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), to allow our company a tax deduction for certain employee compensation exceeding $1,000,000 for an individual. All ~~compensation committee~~Compensation Committee members are also “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 (“Rule 16b-3”) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the” Exchange Act”) to allow our Company to exempt certain option grants and similar transactions from the short-swing profits prohibition of Section 16 of the Exchange Act. To facilitate these determinations, annually each Director completes a questionnaire that provides information about relationships that might affect the determination of independence. Management provides the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and our Board with relevant facts and circumstances of any relationship bearing on the independence of a ~~director~~Director or nominee.

As required under applicable NASDAQ listing standards, in the ~~2015~~2016 fiscal year, our independent Directors regularly met in scheduled executive sessions at which only independent Directors were present.

Board Oversight of Risk

Management continually monitors the material risks facing the Company, including financial, strategic, operational, and legal and compliance risks. An overall review of risk is inherent in the Board’s ongoing consideration of the Company’s long-term strategies, transactions and other matters presented to and discussed by the Board. Additionally, the Board formally reviews the Company’s risk management policies and practices at least annually, after receiving a report from the CEO and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). This annual review includes a discussion of the likelihood and potential magnitude of various risks, as well as any actions management has taken to limit, monitor or control those risks. The CEO and CFO also report to the Board, in a timely manner, events that arise that present material risks to the Company or that materially and adversely change previously identified risks. Additionally, although the full Board has responsibility for overall risk oversight, the Audit Committee annually reviews the Company’s investment policy, corporate information technology policy and risks related to currency fluctuations, and the Compensation Committee seeks to avoid creating incentives for employees to take excessive or inappropriate risks when establishing and administering compensation programs. In performing these functions, these committees assess the appropriateness of the Company’s policies relevant to these risks and consider changes to such policies as appropriate.

Board and Committee Meetings

Our Board holds regularly scheduled quarterly meetings and also holds special meetings and acts by written consent from time to time, as appropriate. At each quarterly Board meeting, time is set aside for the independent Directors to meet without management present. Our Board met ~~six~~seven times during ~~2015.~~2016.

We have adopted a policy that requires a majority of Directors to attend annual meetings either in person or via telephone conference. All ~~eight~~ of our Directors ~~in 2015~~that were elected at the 2016 annual meeting attended the ~~2015~~2016 annual meeting and each incumbent Director attended 75% or more of the Board meetings and meetings of the committees on which they served during the last fiscal ~~year, except for Mr. Christensen, who attended 66.7% of the Board meetings and 100% of the meetings of the Compensation committee, of which he was a member in 2015.~~year.

Standing Committees of the Board

The Board has adopted written charters for its three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, all of which are available on our website at www.pixelworks.com. The Board also previously had the Office of the Chairman Committee which provided counsel and recommendations on matters of strategy, significant transactions and partnerships to the Board and management, but the Board elected to dissolve this committee on April 6, 2016.

The Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are independent Directors as defined by the applicable rules of the SEC and NASDAQ and that all members of such committees satisfy the relevant SEC and NASDAQ requirements for members of such committees.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee provides objective oversight of corporate accounting, financial reporting practices and financial statement audits of the Company and has the responsibility to select, evaluate and, where appropriate, replace the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and is directly responsible for the oversight of the work of such independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee reviews and discusses with management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the Company’s audited financial statements and the effectiveness of the accounting and financial controls of the Company.

The current members of the Audit Committee are Directors Daniel J. Heneghan, who chairs the committee, C. Scott Gibson, and ~~Barry~~Richard L. ~~Cox.~~Sanquini. After reviewing the qualifications of the members of the Audit Committee, the Board has determined that each member meets the financial experience requirements under the rules of the SEC and NASDAQ. In addition, the Board has determined that each member qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined by SEC rules.

The Audit Committee met five times in ~~2015.~~2016.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to compensation of the Company’s Directors, executive officers and employees and oversight and administration of the Company’s incentive and stock-based compensation plans. The Compensation Committee determines compensation for the CEO and all other executive officers of the Company. The Compensation Committee’s other responsibilities include evaluating candidates for executive positions, maintaining a CEO succession plan and reviewing the annual proxy statement.

The current members of the Compensation Committee are Directors Richard L. Sanquini, who chairs the committee, ~~Mark A. Christensen, and~~ C. Scott ~~Gibson.~~Gibson, and David J. Tupman.

The Compensation Committee met six times in ~~2015.~~2016.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee identifies individuals qualified to become members of the Board, recommends the slate of Directors to be nominated by the Board at the annual meeting of shareholders and recommends candidates to fill vacancies on the Board. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is also responsible for developing and recommending to the Board a set of applicable corporate governance guidelines and principles, developing policies and procedures relating to the process for identification and evaluation of Director candidates and minimum qualifications for Directors, and overseeing an evaluation of the Board and recommending Directors to be appointed to committees of the Board (other than to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee itself).

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider recommendations for nominees for Director submitted by shareholders. As set forth in our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws, shareholders seeking to make nominations for Directors should send written notice to the Secretary of the Company not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the meeting, provided, however, that in the event that less than 60 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to shareholders, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be so received not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. Such shareholder’s notice shall set forth (a) as to each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a Director, (i) the name, age, business address and residence address of such person, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of such person, (iii) the class and number of shares of stock of the Company beneficially owned by such person, and (iv) any other information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of Directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (including, without limitation, such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a Director if elected); and (b) as to the shareholder giving the notice, (i) the name and address, as they appear on the Company’s books, of such shareholder, and (ii) the class and number of shares of stock of the Company which are beneficially owned by such shareholder. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers candidates recommended by shareholders in the same manner in which the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates candidates recommended by other sources, including the Board and individual Directors.

The current members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are Directors David J. Tupman who chairs the committee, ~~Mark A. Christensen, and~~ C. Scott ~~Gibson.~~ Gibson, and Daniel J. Heneghan.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee ~~did not meet during 2015, but took certain actions by unanimous written consent.~~met one time in 2016.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No Director who served on the Compensation Committee during ~~2015~~2016 is, or has been, an officer or employee of the Company, nor has any Director had any relationships requiring disclosure under the SEC rules regarding disclosure of certain relationships and related-party transactions.

None of the Company’s executive officers serve on the board of directors or the compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our Board or Compensation Committee.

Qualifications of Directors

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee conducts appropriate inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of proposed Director nominees. At a minimum, candidates must possess experience with businesses or organizations of comparable or greater size than the Company. If a candidate is deemed to have the requisite experience and qualifications, reference checks are performed before the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee recommends the candidate for nomination to the Board.

Factors considered in the selection of Director nominees may include the following:

Independence from management;

Relevant business experience;

Judgment, skill, integrity and reputation;

Existing commitments to other businesses;

Potential conflicts of interest with other pursuits;

Legal considerations such as antitrust issues and involvement by the candidate in specific legal proceedings during the past ten years;

Corporate governance background, including directorships held with public companies or investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 at any time during the past five years;

Financial and accounting background, to enable the committee to determine whether the candidate would be suitable for Audit Committee membership;

Executive compensation background, to enable the committee to determine whether the candidate would be suitable for Compensation Committee membership; and

The size and composition of the existing Board.

The Company is committed to nondiscrimination on the basis of age, gender, ethnic background, religious affiliation or other personal characteristics unrelated to the Company’s purpose and mission. The Board does not have a policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying Director nominees. However, the Board values diversity and considers qualifications and skills that are complementary to those of existing Board members to be highly desirable.

Director Compensation

The ~~compensation committee~~Compensation Committee periodically reviews ~~director~~Director compensation levels and practices, including retainer committee chair fees, equity compensation, and other forms of compensation, and recommends changes from time to time to the Board.

Fee Compensation

Members of our Board who were not officers or employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries ("non-employee Directors") received cash compensation as follows during ~~2015:~~2016:

$8,250 per quarter for service on the Board, with the exception of the Chairman of the Board, who received $14,500 per quarter of service;

$2,000 per quarter for service on the Audit Committee, with the exception of the Chairman of the Audit Committee, who received $4,750 per quarter of service;

$1,250 per quarter for service on the Compensation Committee, with the exception of the Chairman of the Compensation Committee, who received $2,500 per quarter of service; and

$750 per quarter for service on the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, with the exception of the Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, who received $1,500 per quarter of service.

Equity Compensation

During ~~2015,~~2016, non-employee Directors who continued to serve on the Board after the ~~2015~~2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders received an award of RSUs equal to the quotient of $31,000 divided by the 30-day average closing price of the Company's common stock for the 30 trading days immediately preceding the grant date. These awards are scheduled to vest on the first to occur of (1) the day before the next annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders that follows the grant date, or (2) the first anniversary of the grant ~~dates,~~date, and are payable in shares of the Company’s common stock.

The Company's Board compensation policy also provides that any newly elected or appointed non-employee Directors, upon election or appointment to the Board, will receive an initial option award to purchase shares of the Company's common stock that is calculated to have a grant date Black-Scholes value of $47,000 based on the 30-day average closing price of the Company's common stock for the 30 trading days immediately preceding the grant date. The option will have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company's common stock on the grant date, and a maximum term of six years. The award will vest with respect to 25% of the shares on the first anniversary of the grant date, and ratably on a monthly basis thereafter for the next three years. During ~~2015,~~2016, there were no newly elected or appointed non-employee Directors.

Each of the awards discussed above was, or currently would be, granted under the Company’s 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”) and, in the event of a change of control of the Company, any unvested portion of any then in effect and unexpired option will become fully vested immediately prior to the change of control.

Director Stock Ownership Requirement

Board membership includes a requirement that within two years of the date of joining the Board, members shall own at minimum the lower of the value of 10,000 shares or $15,000 of common stock, to be held during each member's tenure on the Board.

Director Compensation Table — ~~2015~~2016

The following table reflects our non-employee Directors’ compensation for fiscal year ~~2015.~~2016. The compensation paid to Mr. DeBonis, our CEO and Mr. Walicek, our former CEO, who was also employed by us during ~~2015,~~2016, is presented below in the “ — Summary Compensation Table” and the related explanatory tables. The compensation paid to Mr. Domenik for his service as our Interim CEO from February to April 2016, is also included in the “ — Summary Compensation Table” and the related explanatory tables. Mr. Domenik received no additional compensation for his service as a Director during his period of service as our Interim CEO. Directors who are also officers or employees of the Company or its subsidiaries receive no additional compensation for their services as Directors, and therefore Mr. DeBonis and Mr. Walicek isare excluded from the table below.


Name	Fees Earned And Paid in Cash	Stock Awards ^{(1) (2)}	Total	Fees Earned And Paid in Cash	Stock Awards ^{(1) (2)}	Total
Mark A. Christensen ⁽³⁾	41,000	28,227	69,227	20,500	—	20,500
Barry L. Cox ⁽⁴⁾⁽³⁾	41,000	28,227	69,227	20,500	—	20,500
Stephen L. Domenik ⁽⁴⁾	39,000	28,227	67,227	24,750	25,322	50,072
C. Scott Gibson ⁽³⁾⁽⁵⁾	49,000	28,227	77,227	49,000	25,322	74,322
Daniel J. Heneghan ⁽³⁾⁽⁵⁾	52,000	28,227	80,227	54,250	25,322	79,572
Richard L. Sanquini ⁽⁴⁾⁽⁶⁾	68,000	28,227	96,227	74,000	25,322	99,322
David J. Tupman ⁽⁴⁾⁽⁷⁾	33,000	28,227	61,227	42,750	25,322	68,072

(1)

This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards granted to our non-employee Directors during ~~2015~~2016 calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, "Compensation — Stock Compensation." For additional information on the valuation assumptions used for the grants, see Note 89 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

(2)

Each of our non-employee Directors who continued to serve on the Board after the ~~2015~~2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, including ~~Mr. Christensen, Mr. Cox,~~ Mr. Domenik, Mr. Gibson, Mr. Heneghan, Mr. Sanquini and ~~Mr.~~Dr. Tupman, received an RSU award covering ~~6,626~~15,163 shares of our common stock on May ~~13, 2015,~~11, 2016, the date of our ~~2015~~2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The grant date fair value of each RSU was ~~$28,227.~~$25,322.


(3)	Mr. Christensen and Mr. Cox resigned from the Board on May 11, 2016.


(4)	Mr. Domenik resigned from the Board on November 14, 2016.


(5)	Mr. Gibson and Mr. Heneghan each held options to purchase 6,666 shares of our common stock and had ~~6,626~~15,163 RSUs outstanding as of December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.


~~(4)~~(6)	Mr. ~~Cox, Mr. Domenik, Mr.~~ Sanquini ~~and Mr.~~had 15,163 RSUs outstanding as of December 31, 2016.


(7)	Dr. Tupman ~~each~~ held options to purchase 10,000 shares of our common stock and had ~~6,626~~15,163 RSUs outstanding as of December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

Communications with the Board

Shareholders or other interested parties can contact any Director or committee of the Board by writing to them at:

Pixelworks Board of Directors

224 Airport Parkway, Ste. 400

San Jose, CA 95110

Board members may also be contacted via email at bod@pixelworks.com.

Communication received will be distributed to the full Board at the next regularly scheduled Board meeting, or sooner, if deemed necessary. Communication that is unduly hostile, threatening, illegal or similarly inappropriate will be discarded and appropriate legal action may be taken.

Code of Ethics

The Company has a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Business Conduct”) that applies to all Directors and employees, including the CEO, CFO and all other executive officers of the Company. The Company also has a Code of Ethics for Senior or Designated Financial Personnel (the “Code of Ethics for Senior or Designated Financial Personnel”) that applies to our senior financial officers, including our CEO, CFO and other designated financial personnel. The Code of Ethics for Senior or Designated Financial Personnel and the Code of Business Conduct are available on our website at www.pixelworks.com. The Company intends to disclose any changes in or waivers from its Code of Ethics for Senior or Designated Financial Personnel by posting such information on its website at www.pixelworks.com or by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K.

PROPOSAL NO. 2: APPROVAL OF AMENDED AND RESTATED 2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

Overview

On April ~~6, 2016,~~5, 2017, based on a recommendation from our Compensation Committee, the Board approved an amendment and restatement of the Company’s Amended and Restated 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”) and directed that it be submitted for shareholder approval at the Annual Meeting. The proposed amendment and restatement of the 2006 Plan increases the number of shares authorized for issuance thereunder by ~~1,200,000~~1,300,000 shares to ~~10,683,333~~11,983,333 shares. The proposal would also extend the term of the 2006 Plan until April ~~6, 2026,~~5, 2027, the date that is ten (10) years following the effective date of the restatement. These changes will be effective as of the date the Board approved the amendment and restatement of the 2006 Plan, subject to shareholder approval of this proposal at the Annual Meeting.

The Board determined that the available shares under the 2006 Plan were insufficient to provide annual grants to our executive officers and employees similar to those provided in the prior year. The Board believes that approval of this share reserve increase will allow the Company to provide additional long-term incentives to the Company’s executive officers, employees and ~~directors,~~Directors, as well as maintain compensation packages that align our employees', executive officers', and ~~directors'~~Directors' interests to those of our shareholders and remain competitive to attract and retain individuals that can contribute to our success. If approved, the total number of shares available following the increase will represent approximately ~~8.9%~~5.4% of the Company's outstanding common stock, which the Board believes is a reasonable amount of potential dilution.

Promotion of Good Corporate Governance

The existing 2006 Plan includes a number of responsible corporate governance provisions. These include, but are not limited to, the following:

No Discounted Options. Stock options and stock appreciation rights ("SARs") may not be granted with exercise prices lower than the fair market value of the underlying shares on the grant date.

No Transferability. Awards generally may not be transferred, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, except as otherwise specifically provided for in the award agreement.

No Tax Gross-ups. The 2006 Plan does not provide for any tax gross-ups.

Key Data

As of March ~~18, 2016,~~17, 2017, awards representing the right to acquire ~~10,265,392~~12,942,583 shares of our common stock have been granted pursuant to the 2006 Plan. As of March ~~18, 2016,~~17, 2017, there are ~~3,080,075~~2,009,827 shares subject to awards outstanding under the 2006 Plan. The stock options outstanding under the 2006 Plan have a weighted average exercise price of ~~$2.68~~$2.28 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of ~~2.21~~2.59 years. Our three year average burn rate for the years ~~2013~~2014 through ~~2015,~~2016, calculated as the total number of shares granted, shares underlying options grants and shares underlying RSUs divided by our total common shares outstanding is ~~11.5%~~15.8%.

Based on the number of shares which have been issued under the 2006 Plan and those covered by awards outstanding, as of March ~~18, 2016,~~17, 2017, there are ~~1,291,827~~284,663 shares that remain available for grant under the 2006 Plan prior to approval of the ~~1,200,000~~ 1,300,000 share pool increase. This available share number reflects the reduction of the available share pool by 1.33 shares for each share issued on or after May 19, 2009, with respect to a full value award. Full value awards include RSUs and restricted share awards. The following table shows information regarding the distribution of awards under the 2006 Plan, as of March ~~18, 2016.~~17, 2017.


	Number of shares subject to stock options		Number of shares subject to RSU's		Total		Number of shares subject to stock options		Number of shares subject to RSU's		Total
Gross Number of Shares Covered by Past Awards	5,813,893		3,303,529		9,117,422		6,130,893		5,146,274		11,277,167
Adjustment for Full Value Awards (1.33:1 ratio for share pool)	—		1,051,170		1,051,170		—		1,665,416		1,665,416
Aggregate Past Grants (with Adjustment for Full Value Awards)	5,813,893		4,354,699		10,168,592		6,130,893		6,811,690		12,942,583
Cancellations	(1,696,614	)	(280,472	)	(1,977,086	)	(2,151,717	)	(392,196	)	(2,543,913	)
Outstanding Grants (with Adjustment for Full Value Awards)	4,117,279		4,074,227		8,191,506		3,979,176		6,419,494		10,398,670
Shares Currently Authorized for Issuance					9,483,333						10,683,333
Shares Currently Remaining Available for Grant					1,291,827						284,663

For a description of the 2006 Plan, see “ — Summary Description of the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan” below.

If our shareholders do not approve this proposal, the current share limits under, and other terms and conditions of, the 2006 Plan will continue in effect.

Summary Description of the 2006 ~~Stock Incentive~~ Plan

In 2006, the Board adopted, and our shareholders approved, the 2006 Plan. The 2006 Plan has since been amended on certain occasions, most recently on May ~~13, 2015~~11, 2016 when our shareholders approved an increase to the total number of authorized shares to ~~9,483,333.~~10,683,333. On April ~~6, 2016,~~5, 2017, the Board approved, subject to and effective upon shareholder approval, the amendment and restatement of the 2006 Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance thereunder by ~~1,200,000~~1,300,000 shares. If the proposal to amend and restate the 2006 Plan is approved by our shareholders, the total number of authorized shares will increase to a total of ~~10,683,333~~11,983,333 shares, and the term of the 2006 Plan will be extended for a term of ten (10) years following the effective date of the amendment and restatement.

The following summary of the material features of the 2006 Plan is qualified by reference to the terms of the 2006 Plan, the full text of which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A in substantially the form in which it will take effect if this Proposal 2 is approved by the shareholders. The 2006 Plan has also been filed electronically with the SEC and, together with this Proxy Statement, can be accessed on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. You may also obtain, free of charge, a copy of the 2006 Plan by writing to our Secretary, care of Pixelworks, Inc. at 224 Airport Parkway, Suite 400, San Jose, CA 95110. If shareholder approval of this proposal is not obtained, no additional grants of options to purchase shares of common stock, SARs, restricted shares or RSUs under the 2006 Plan in excess of those authorized for issuance prior to the amendment and restatement would be made.

Eligibility

All of our employees, ~~directors~~Directors and consultants are eligible to participate in the 2006 Plan. As of March ~~18, 2016,~~17, 2017, we have approximately ~~214~~162 full-time employees and ~~six~~four non-employee ~~directors.~~Directors. Our Named Executive Officers (as defined below) received RSUs under the 2006 Plan in ~~2015~~2016 as set forth in this Proxy Statement in the " — Grants of Plan-Based Awards — ~~2015"~~2016" table under "Executive Compensation." Our non-employee Directors received RSUs under the 2006 Stock Plan in ~~2015~~2016 as set forth in this Proxy Statement under "Information About our Board of Directors — Director Compensation."

Administration

The 2006 Plan is required to be administered by the Board or a committee appointed by the Board. The 2006 Plan is currently administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board, which is composed of members that are "non-employee directors" within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act and "outside directors" within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. Subject to applicable law, our Board may also authorize one or more officers to designate employees, other than employees who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, to receive awards under the 2006 Stock Plan and/or determine the number of such awards to be received by such employees subject to limits specified by our Board. All questions of interpretation or application of the 2006 Plan are determined in the sole discretion of the Board or the Compensation Committee, whose decisions are final, conclusive and binding upon all participants. Members of the Board are permitted to participate in the 2006 Plan.

Subject to the provisions of the 2006 Plan, the Compensation Committee has the authority to construe and interpret the 2006 Plan, to prescribe, adopt, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the administration of the 2006 Plan and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for its administration. Subject to the limitations of the 2006 Plan, the Compensation Committee also selects from among the eligible persons those individuals who will receive awards under the 2006 Plan, the type(s) of award(s) any such individual will receive and the terms of any such awards.

No Repricing

In no case (except due to an adjustment to reflect a stock split or similar event or any repricing that may be approved by shareholders) will any adjustment be made to a stock option or SAR award under the 2006 Plan (by amendment, cancellation and re-grant, exchange or other means) that would constitute a repricing of the per share exercise or base price of the award.

Shares Subject to the 2006 Plan

The maximum cumulative aggregate number of shares of our common stock to be issued under the 2006 Plan and currently approved by shareholders is ~~9,483,333,~~10,683,333, subject to adjustment as described below. At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders are being asked to approve an amendment and restatement of the 2006 Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance thereunder by ~~1,200,000~~1,300,000 shares. The maximum number of shares that may be issued upon the exercise of Incentive Stock Options would also be increased to the same number.

Since May 19, 2009, shares issued in respect of any “full-value award” granted under the 2006 Plan count against the share limit described above as 1.33 shares for every one share issued in connection with the award. For example, if the Company granted a stock bonus award covering 100 shares of its common stock under the 2006 Plan, 133 shares would be charged against the share limit with respect to that award. For this purpose, a “full-value award” generally means any award granted under the 2006 Plan other than a stock option or SAR. Stock options and SARs will be counted against the share limit on a share-for-share basis.

Shares that are subject to or underlie awards which expire or for any reason are canceled or terminated, are forfeited, fail to vest, or for any other reason are not paid or delivered under the 2006 Plan will again be available for subsequent awards under the 2006 Plan. The following types of shares will not be available for future award grant purposes under the 2006 Plan: (1) shares subject to a stock option or SAR that are not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of the award; (2) shares used to pay the exercise price or withholding taxes related to an outstanding award; or (3) shares repurchased on the open market using the proceeds of the exercise of a stock option.

No employee may receive options or SARs under the 2006 Plan that cover more than 250,000 shares cumulatively in any fiscal year, except that options or SARs covering up to an additional 250,000 shares may be granted in connection with a person’s initial employment with the Company.

Types of Awards

Under the 2006 Plan we can grant stock options and stock-settled SARs. However, only employees may receive Incentive Stock Options. The 2006 Plan also allows us to grant to our employees, ~~directors~~Directors and consultants awards of restricted stock, stock bonuses and other forms of awards granted or denominated in the Company’s common stock or units of the Company’s common stock.

Stock Options: The Compensation Committee may grant stock options to participants subject to the terms and conditions established by the Compensation Committee. A stock option represents a right to purchase a specified number of shares of our common stock at a certain exercise price during a specified period. A stock option may be in the form of an Incentive Stock Option or a stock option that does not qualify for incentive treatment (a “Nonqualified Stock Option”) under the Code. The option award agreement will specify the vesting, exercisability and other terms of the award. The maximum term of an option granted under the 2006 Plan is six years (or five years in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to an employee who at the time owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of the capital stock of the Company).

SARs: The Compensation Committee may grant SARs to participants subject to the terms and conditions established by the Compensation Committee. The term of a SAR may not exceed six years. When exercised, a SAR entitles the participant to a payment based on the excess of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the exercise date over the fair market value of a share of common stock on the grant date. Payment shall be made solely in shares of our common stock. The SAR award agreement will specify the vesting, exercisability and other terms of the award.

Restricted Stock Units: The Compensation Committee may grant RSUs to participants subject to the terms and conditions established by the Compensation Committee. RSUs give recipients the right to acquire a specified number of shares of stock at a future date upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, including any vesting arrangement, established by the Compensation Committee and as set forth in an RSU agreement. Generally an RSU is to be settled promptly after vesting by delivery of the shares subject to the RSU award. If the vesting date occurs during a trading blackout period, certain of our RSU award agreements provide for the automatic deferral of stock delivery until the end of such blackout period.

Exercise or Purchase Price

The exercise price of each Incentive Stock Option, Nonqualified Stock Option and SAR granted under the 2006 Plan will be determined by the Compensation Committee, but will be not less than 100% of the “Fair Market Value” (as defined in the 2006 Plan) of our common stock on the date of grant (or 110% of Fair Market Value in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to an employee who at the time owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of the capital stock of the Company). Whether an option granted under the 2006 Plan is intended to be an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option will be determined by the Compensation Committee at the time the Compensation Committee acts to grant the option and will be set forth in the related stock option agreement. “Fair Market Value” for purposes of the 2006 Plan means the closing price of a share of common stock on a national exchange on which shares of common stock are then trading, if any, on the last market trading day on or before the grant date. If there is no listing or trading of common stock either on a national exchange or over-the-counter, the price will be determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. On March ~~18, 2016,~~17, 2017, the Fair Market Value was ~~$2.35~~$4.84 per share based on the closing price of the common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market.

In the discretion of the Compensation Committee, the exercise price of any option or SAR granted under the 2006 Plan and the sale price of any shares sold under the 2006 Plan will be payable in full in cash, by check or by the optionee’s promissory note (subject to any limitations of applicable law) delivered at the time of exercise. RSUs may only be settled in shares of our common stock. In the discretion of the Compensation Committee and upon receipt of all regulatory approvals, an optionee may be permitted to deliver as payment in whole or in part of the exercise price certificates for our common stock or other property deemed appropriate by the Compensation Committee. So-called cashless exercises as permitted under applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the Federal Reserve Board also will be permitted in the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

Irrespective of the manner of payment of the exercise price of an option or the purchase price for shares, the delivery of shares pursuant to the exercise or purchase will be conditioned upon payment by the optionee or purchaser of amounts sufficient to enable us to pay all applicable federal, state and local withholding taxes.

Transferability of Awards

An award granted under the 2006 Plan will be nontransferable by the recipient other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution and will be exercisable during the recipient’s lifetime only by the recipient or by his or her guardian or legal representative, except as otherwise specifically provided for in the award agreement. More particularly, an award may not be assigned, transferred (except as provided in the preceding sentence), pledged or hypothecated (whether by operation of law or otherwise), and will not be subject to execution, attachment or similar process, except as otherwise specifically provided for in the award agreement.

Conditions to Issuance of Stock Certificates; Legends

In order to enforce any restrictions imposed upon common stock issued upon exercise of any option or SAR granted under or any shares sold or issued pursuant to the 2006 Plan, the Compensation Committee may cause a legend or legends to be placed on any share certificates representing such common stock.

Adjustments upon Changes in Capitalization, Merger and Consolidation

If our outstanding shares of common stock are changed into or exchanged for cash or a different number or kind of shares or securities of Pixelworks or of another corporation through reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, stock split-up, reverse stock split, stock dividend, stock consolidation, stock combination, stock reclassification or similar transaction, an appropriate adjustment will be made by the Compensation Committee in the number and kind of shares as to which awards may be granted, as well as in the price per share of the common stock covered by each outstanding award. In the event we sell all or substantially all of our assets or merge with or into another company, the Compensation Committee may (a) arrange to have the surviving or successor entity assume or grant replacement options with appropriate adjustments in the number and kind of securities and option prices, or (b) accelerate the vesting of and shorten the period during which options are exercisable. No fractional shares of common stock will be issued on account of any of the foregoing adjustments.

If we are dissolved or liquidated, each outstanding award will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of the dissolution or liquidation unless the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, declares that all awards will terminate as of a fixed date and accelerates the vesting schedule of all outstanding awards.

Amendment and Termination

The Board may at any time suspend, amend or terminate the 2006 Plan and may, with the consent of an award holder, make such modifications to the terms and conditions of such recipient’s award as it deems advisable; provided, however, that the Company must obtain shareholder approval of any amendment to the extent necessary to comply with Rule 16b-3 or with Section 422 of the Code or with rules promulgated by NASDAQ. The amendment, suspension or termination of the 2006 Plan will not, however, without the consent of the participant to be affected, alter or impair any rights or obligations under any award.

Privileges of Stock Ownership

A participant in the 2006 Plan will not be entitled to the privilege of stock ownership as to any shares of common stock unless and until they are actually issued to the participant.

Termination

Unless earlier terminated by the Board or the Compensation Committee, the 2006 Plan will terminate automatically as of the close of business on April ~~9, 2025,~~5, 2026, the day preceding the tenth anniversary of the effective date of the 2006 Plan as approved by our shareholders last year. The termination of the 2006 Plan will not affect the validity of any award agreement outstanding at the date of such termination. However, if the shareholders approve this proposal to amend and restate the 2006 Plan, then the term will be extended through April ~~6, 2026,~~4, 2027, the day preceding the tenth anniversary of the effective date of such amendment and restatement.

Certain United States Federal Income Tax Consequences to Recipients of Awards

The following is only a summary of certain United States federal income tax consequences to recipients of awards under the 2006 Plan and is for general information purposes only. This summary is based on the United States federal income tax laws now in effect, and as currently interpreted, and does not take into account possible changes in such laws or interpretations. Furthermore, this summary is not intended to be exhaustive and, among other considerations, does not describe state, local or foreign tax consequences. This summary does not consider the United States federal income tax consequences to recipients in light of their individual circumstances or to recipients subject to special treatment under the federal income tax laws. THIS SUMMARY IS NOT INTENDED AS TAX ADVICE TO ANY PERSON AND RECIPIENTS OF AWARDS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS FOR ANY FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN TAX EFFECTS ON THEIR INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES.

Under the Code, neither the grant nor the exercise of Incentive Stock Options is a taxable event to the optionee (except to the extent an optionee may be subject to alternative minimum tax); rather, the optionee is subject to tax only upon the sale of the common stock acquired upon exercise of the Incentive Stock Option. Upon such a sale, the entire difference between the amount realized upon the sale and the exercise price of the option will be taxable to the optionee. Subject to certain holding period requirements, such difference will be taxed as a capital gain rather than as ordinary income.

Recipients who receive Nonqualified Stock Options or SARs will be subject to taxation upon exercise of such options or SARs on the spread between the Fair Market Value of the common stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price of such options or SARs. This spread is treated as ordinary income to the recipient, and the Company is permitted to deduct as a compensation expense a corresponding amount. Nonqualified Stock Options and SARs do not give rise to a tax preference item subject to the alternative minimum tax.

The current federal income tax consequences of other awards authorized under the 2006 Plan generally follow certain basic patterns: nontransferable restricted stock subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture results in income recognition equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value over the price paid (if any) only at the time the restrictions lapse (unless the recipient elects to accelerate recognition as of the date of grant); stock bonuses, stock units and other stock-based awards are generally subject to tax at the time of payment; and compensation otherwise effectively deferred is taxed when paid. In each of the foregoing cases, the Company will generally have a corresponding deduction at the time the participant recognizes income.

If an award is accelerated under the 2006 Plan in connection with a “change in control” (as this term is used in section 280G of the Code), the Company may not be permitted to deduct the portion of the compensation attributable to the acceleration if it exceeds certain threshold limits under the Code (and certain related excise taxes may be triggered). Furthermore, the aggregate compensation in excess of $1,000,000 attributable to awards that are not “performance-based” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code may not be permitted to be deducted by the Company in certain circumstances.

THE FOREGOING IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF THE EFFECT OF FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION UPON PARTICIPANTS AND THE COMPANY WITH RESPECT TO THE GRANT AND EXERCISE OF AWARDS UNDER THE 2006 PLAN. IT DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE COMPLETE, AND DOES NOT DISCUSS THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF A SERVICE PROVIDER’S DEATH OR THE PROVISIONS OF THE INCOME TAX LAWS OF ANY MUNICIPALITY, STATE OR FOREIGN COUNTRY IN WHICH THE SERVICE PROVIDER MAY RESIDE.

Other

Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation over $1,000,000 paid to the CEO and certain other executive officers in any taxable year of the company. Qualifying performance-based compensation is not subject to the deduction limit if certain requirements are met.

The 2006 Plan is not a tax-qualified deferred compensation plan under 401(a) of the Code, and is not subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

Section 409A of the Code provides certain requirements for non-qualified deferred compensation arrangements with respect to an individual's deferral and distribution elections and permissible distribution events. Awards granted under the 2006 Plan with a deferral feature will be subject to the requirements of Section 409A. If an award is subject to and fails to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A, the recipient of that award may recognize ordinary income on the amounts deferred under the award, to the extent vested, which may be prior to when the compensation is actually or constructively received. Also, if an award that is subject to Section 409A fails to comply with Section 409A's provisions, Section 409A imposes an additional 20% federal income tax on compensation recognized as ordinary income, as well as interest on such deferred compensation. Certain states have enacted laws similar to Section 409A which impose additional taxes, interest and penalties on non-qualified deferred compensation arrangements. We will also have withholding and reporting requirements with respect to such amounts.

Aggregate Past Grants Under the 2006 Plan

The following table shows information regarding the issuance of past awards under the 2006 Plan among the persons and groups identified below through March ~~18, 2016, other than the conditional 2016 grants (see "New Plan Benefits Under the 2006 Plan" below).~~17, 2017.


Name and Position	Number of shares subject to stock options	Number of shares subject to RSU's	Total	Number of shares subject to stock options	Number of shares subject to RSU's	Total
Named Executive Officers:
Todd A. DeBonis ⁽¹⁾				350,000	290,000	640,000
President and CEO
Stephen L. Domenik ⁽¹⁾				53,750	142,191	195,941
Former Interim CEO
Bruce A. Walicek⁽¹⁾	631,665	515,000	1,146,665	631,665	515,000	1,146,665
Former CEO
Steven L. Moore	361,665	145,500	507,165	361,665	275,500	567,165
Vice President, CFO, Treasurer and Secretary
All current executive officers, as a group (3 persons)⁽²⁾	765,415	272,528	1,037,943
All current directors who are not executive officers, as a group (6 persons)	77,997	417,029	495,026
All employees, including officers who are not executive officers, as a group	4,970,481	2,613,972	7,584,453
All current executive officers, as a group (2 persons) ⁽²⁾				711,665	565,500	1,277,165
All current directors who are not executive officers, as a group (4 persons)				51,998	327,449	379,447
All employees, including former employees, officers who are not executive officers and former directors, as a group				5,367,230	4,253,325	9,620,555

This table includes shares subject to awards that expired or terminated without having been exercised or paid and thus became available for new award grants under the 2006 Plan. This table does not reflect the effect of the fungible share feature that allots 1.33 shares for each 1 share covered by RSU awards.


(1)	Effective February 1, 2016, Bruce A. Walicek resigned from his positions as CEO and as a member of the Board. On February 1, 2016, Stephen L. Domenik, a member of the Board, was appointed as Interim CEO of Pixelworks, Inc. and Todd A. DeBonis was appointed as Chief Operating Officer of Pixelworks, Inc. On April 27, 2016, Todd A. DeBonis was appointed as President and CEO.


(2)	Our current executive officers are Todd A. DeBonis and Steven L. Moore.

(2)Our current executive officers are Stephen L. Domenik, Steven L. Moore and Todd A. DeBonis. The aggregate past grants under the 2006 Plan through March 18, 2016 for Mr. Domenik and Mr. DeBonis are as follows:

Name Number of shares subject to stock options Number of shares subject to RSU's Total
Stephen L. Domenik 53,750
127,028
180,778
Todd A. DeBonis 350,000
—
350,000

These tables include shares subject to awards that expired or terminated without having been exercised or paid and thus became available for new award grants under the 2006 Plan. These tables do not reflect the effect of the fungible share feature that allots 1.33 shares for each 1 share covered by RSU awards.

New Plan Benefits Under the 2006 Plan

The grant of additional stock-based awards under the 2006 Plan in the future and the nature of any such awards are subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee (or, in the case of awards to non-employee ~~directors,~~Directors, the Board). Accordingly, other than the annual grants to our non-employee ~~directors,~~Directors, it is not possible to determine the number, amount and type of awards to be granted under the 2006 Plan as a result of the proposed amendment (or that would have been granted in ~~2015~~2016 had this proposed amendment of the 2006 Plan then been in effect). The annual grants on the date of the Annual Meeting for non-employee ~~directors~~Directors will vest on the earlier of the day before the next annual meeting that follows the grant date and the first anniversary of the grant date. The following table shows the amount of such ~~awards.~~awards (without reflecting the effect of the 2006 Plan’s fungible share feature that allots 1.33 shares for each 1 share covered by RSU awards).



Name and Position	Market Value of RSUs ($)	Number of shares subject to RSU's
Named Executive Officers:
Todd A. DeBonis ⁽¹⁾	—	—
President and CEO
Stephen L. Domenik ⁽¹⁾
Former Interim CEO
Bruce A. Walicek ⁽¹⁾
Former CEO
Steven L. Moore	—	—
Vice President, CFO, Treasurer and Secretary
All current executive officers, as a group (2 persons) ⁽²⁾	—	—
All current directors who are not executive officers, as a group (4 persons)	124,000	25,620	⁽³	⁾
All employees, including officers who are not executive officers, as a group	—	—

Name and Position Market Value of RSUs ($) Number of shares subject to RSU's
Named Executive Officers:
Bruce A. Walicek⁽¹⁾
—
—

Former CEO
Steven L. Moore —
—

Vice President, CFO, Treasurer and Secretary
All current executive officers, as a group (3 persons)⁽²⁾
—
—

All current directors who are not executive officers, as a group (6 persons) 186,000
79,149
⁽³
⁾
All employees, including officers who are not executive officers, as a group —
—


(1)	Effective February 1, 2016, Bruce A. Walicek resigned from his positions as CEO and as a member of the Board. On February 1, 2016, Stephen L. Domenik, a member of the Board, was appointed as Interim CEO of Pixelworks, Inc. and Todd A. DeBonis was appointed as Chief Operating Officer of Pixelworks, Inc. On April 27, 2016, Todd A. DeBonis was appointed as President and CEO.

~~(2)Our current executive officers are Stephen L. Domenik, Steven L. Moore and Todd A. DeBonis. The new plan benefit information for Mr. Domenik and Mr. DeBonis is as follows:~~



~~Name~~(2)	~~Market Value of RSUs ($)~~	~~Number of shares subject to RSU's~~
~~Stephen L. Domenik~~	—	—
Our current executive officers are Todd A. DeBonis	—	—	and Steven L. Moore.

(3)

The annual RSU award to be granted to the ~~six~~four non-employee ~~directors~~Directors on the date of the Annual Meeting will cover that number of shares equal to $31,000 divided by the average 30-day closing price of our stock. For purposes of estimating the number of shares to be subject to these RSUs during ~~2016,~~2017, the March ~~18, 2016~~17, 2017 closing price of ~~$2.35~~$4.84 has been used.

Equity Compensation Plans

For more information on our equity compensation plans, please see the section titled “ — Information About Our Equity Compensation Plans” below.

Vote Required for Approval

The Board believes that approval of the ~~amended and restated Pixelworks, Inc.~~ 2006 ~~Stock Incentive~~ Plan will promote the Company’s interests and the interests of its shareholders and continue to enable the Company to attract, retain and reward persons important to its success.

All members of the Board and all of the Company’s executive officers are eligible for awards under the 2006 Plan and thus have a personal interest in the approval of the amendment and restatement of the 2006 Plan.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting will be required to approve this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF

THE AMENDED AND RESTATED PIXELWORKS, INC. 2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN AS DESCRIBED ABOVE AND SET FORTH IN APPENDIX A HERETO.

INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

The following table provides information as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 with respect to the shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under the Company’s existing equity compensation plans:


Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights ⁽¹⁾		Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights ⁽²⁾		Number of securities remaining available for issuance under compensation plans (excluding securities in first column) ⁽³⁾	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights ⁽¹⁾		Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights ⁽²⁾		Number of securities remaining available for issuance under compensation plans (excluding securities in first column) ⁽³⁾
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders ⁽⁴⁾	3,975,796	⁽⁵⁾	$	2.98	2,354,773	4,204,202	⁽⁵⁾	$	2.46	1,712,566
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders	—		—		—	—		—		—
Total	3,975,796		$	2.98	2,354,773	4,204,202		$	2.46	1,712,566

(1)

Excludes purchase rights under the 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). The ESPP provides for 18 month offering periods with purchases every six months. Under the ESPP, each eligible employee may purchase shares of the Company’s common stock on each purchase date, with a maximum annual purchase amount of $25,000. The purchase price per share is equal to 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock on (i) the offering date or (ii) the purchase date.


(2)	Represents the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding stock options.

(3)

Includes ~~798,495~~656,862 shares that were available for future issuance under the ESPP and ~~1,556,278~~1,055,704 shares that were available for future issuance under the 2006 Plan. The shares available for awards under the 2006 Plan are, subject to certain other limits under the plan, generally available for any type of award authorized under that plan, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted and unrestricted stock awards and other stock-based awards.


(4)	Consists of the ~~Company’s~~ 2006 Plan ~~1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended,~~ and the 2010 ESPP. ~~With the adoption of the 2006 Plan, the right to issue any additional awards under the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan was terminated.~~


(5)	Includes ~~3,057,120~~2,505,702 options and ~~918,676~~1,698,500 full-value awards.

PROPOSAL NO. 3: RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of the Board (the “Audit Committee”), which is composed entirely of independent ~~directors,~~Directors, has selected KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as the auditors of the Company for the year ending December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. The submission of this matter for approval by shareholders is not legally required; however, as a matter of good corporate practice, our shareholders are being asked to ratify this appointment. Before selecting KPMG LLP, the Audit Committee considered the firm’s qualifications as independent registered public accountants and concluded that based on its prior performance and its reputation for integrity and competence, it is qualified.

In the event the shareholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection but may elect to retain KPMG LLP. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its sole discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the fiscal year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.

Representatives of KPMG LLP will be at the Annual Meeting and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. They do not plan to make a statement, but will have the opportunity to make one if they wish.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP TO SERVE AS THE

COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR

THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees paid to KPMG LLP during ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014:~~2015:


	2015		2014		2016		2015
Audit Fees ⁽¹⁾	$	557,000	$	482,875	$	450,000	$	557,000
Audit-Related Fees	—		—		—		—
Tax Fees ⁽²⁾	—		3,875		—		—
All Other Fees	—		—		—		—
Total	$	557,000	$	486,750	$	450,000	$	557,000


(1)	Audit Fees: Consists of fees billed for services rendered for the integrated audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and reviews of the Company’s interim condensed consolidated financial statements. Also includes fees billed for reviews of registration statements and our 2015 registered equity offering.


~~(2)~~	~~Tax Fees: Consists of fees billed for tax compliance and preparation services related to certain expatriate employee tax returns.~~

Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services

The Audit Committee pre-approves any engagement under which KPMG LLP provides audit or permissible non-audit services to the Company. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the pre-approval of these services. Under the policy, pre-approval may be general and apply to services that will be performed over an extended period of time, or specific. General pre-approvals apply for one year. The Company’s CFO and KPMG LLP must provide the Audit Committee with the following information for each service to be approved: (i) the type of service to be performed; (ii) a detailed description of each particular service; and (iii) a range of fees. Throughout the year, the Audit Committee will review any revisions to the estimates of audit and non-audit fees initially approved.

The authority to pre-approve services may be delegated to one or more designated members of the Audit Committee. If a designated member does pre-approve services, the pre-approval is reported to the full Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. During the approval process, the Audit Committee considers the impact of the types of services and the related fees on the independence of the registered public accountant. The services and fees must be deemed compatible with the maintenance of such accountant's independence, including compliance with SEC rules and regulations. During ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, the Audit Committee pre-approved 100% of the services provided by KPMG LLP.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The information contained in the report below does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by reference therein.

The Audit Committee currently consists of Daniel J. Heneghan, Chairman, ~~Barry L. Cox and~~ C. Scott ~~Gibson.~~Gibson and Richard Sanquini. The Audit Committee has the responsibility and authority described in the Pixelworks, Inc. Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which has been approved by the Board. A copy of the Audit Committee Charter is available on our website at www.pixelworks.com. The Board has determined that Mr. Heneghan, Mr. ~~Cox~~Gibson and Mr. ~~Gibson~~Sanquini meet the independence requirements set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act and in the applicable rules of NASDAQ. In addition, the Board has determined that Mr. Heneghan, Mr. ~~Cox~~Gibson and Mr. ~~Gibson~~Sanquini each qualify as an audit committee financial expert as defined by SEC rules.

As further described in its charter, the Audit Committee oversees the corporate accounting, financial reporting practices and financial statement audits of the Company. Management has responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. The independent auditors, KPMG, are responsible for planning and conducting audits in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and for issuing an opinion about whether the financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and on our effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting based on criteria established in Internal

Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the conduct of these activities by management and KPMG.

Audit Committee members are not professional accountants or auditors, and their functions are not intended to duplicate or to certify the activities of management and the independent audit firm. The Audit Committee serves a Board-level oversight role, in which it provides advice, counsel, and direction to management and to the auditors on the basis of the information it receives, discussions with management and the auditors, and the experience of the Audit Committee members in business, financial, and accounting matters.

In this context, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements and the Company’s internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, with management and KPMG, and management has represented to the Audit Committee that Pixelworks’ audited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee’s review included a discussion with management of the quality of Pixelworks’ accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant estimates and judgments, and the clarity of disclosure in Pixelworks’ financial statements, including the disclosures related to critical accounting estimates.

The Audit Committee discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 161301 as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and approved by the SEC. Additionally, the Audit Committee has received from KPMG the written disclosures and letter required by the applicable requirements of PCAOB Rule 3526 (Communications with Audit Committees Concerning Independence) regarding KPMG’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed KPMG’s independence with KPMG.

The Audit Committee has also evaluated the performance of KPMG, including, among other things, the amount of fees paid to KPMG for audit services related to the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. Based on its evaluation, the Audit Committee has selected KPMG to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, and subject to the limitations of the Audit Committee’s role and responsibilities referred to in the Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, the inclusion of the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.



	Respectfully submitted,

	Daniel J. Heneghan, Chairman
	~~Barry L. Cox~~C. Scott Gibson
	~~C. Scott Gibson~~Richard L. Sanquini

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership as of March ~~18, 2016~~17, 2017 of our common stock by:


(i)	Each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Company’s common stock;


(ii)	Each Director and each Director nominee of the Company;


(iii)	Each Named Executive Officer (as defined below) of the Company; and


(iv)	All current executive officers and Directors as a group.

Applicable percentage ownership is based on ~~28,076,767~~29,536,777 shares of common stock outstanding at March ~~18, 2016.~~17, 2017. Based on our review of statements filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(d) or 13(g) of the Exchange Act, as of March ~~18, 2016,~~17, 2017, we had no beneficial owners of more than five percent of our common stock, except as noted below. For purposes of computing the amounts reported under "Number of Shares Beneficially Owned" and "Percentage Beneficially Owned" for each person or group of persons named below, the number of shares subject to stock options and RSUs that become exercisable or vest within 60 days of March ~~18, 2016~~17, 2017 (which are shown in the columns to the right) are deemed to be outstanding, but are not deemed to be outstanding for purposes of computing the beneficial ownership of any other person or group of persons.


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner ⁽¹⁾	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned	Percentage Beneficially Owned		Number of Shares Subject to Options Exercisable Within 60 Days of March 18, 2016	Number of RSUs That Vest Within 60 Days of March 18, 2016	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned	Percentage Beneficially Owned		Number of Shares Subject to Options Exercisable Within 60 Days of March 17, 2017	Number of RSUs That Vest Within 60 Days of March 17, 2017
5% or Greater Shareholders:
John A. Kryzanowski ⁽²⁾	2,733,900	9.7	%	—	—	2,860,000	9.7	%	—	—
Heartland Advisors, Inc. ⁽³⁾						2,250,000	7.6	%	—	—
Directors, Nominees and Named Executive Officers:
Mark A. Christensen	123,477	*		6,666	6,626
Barry L. Cox	75,116	*		10,000	6,626
C. Scott Gibson	101,333	*		6,666	6,626	101,496	*		6,666	15,163
Daniel J. Heneghan	130,597	*		6,666	6,626	145,760	*		6,666	15,163
Richard L. Sanquini	154,975	*		—	6,626	170,138	*		—	15,163
David J. Tupman	42,834	*		5,208	6,626	57,847	*		7,708	15,163
Stephen L. Domenik	303,484	1.1	%	31,875	6,626
Todd A. DeBonis ⁽³⁾	75,000	*		—	—
Todd A. DeBonis						258,875	*		109,375	49,500
Steven L. Moore	584,201	2.1	%	301,665	—	596,801	2.0	%	241,665	19,800
Bruce A. Walicek ⁽⁴⁾	871,201	3.1	%	531,665	24,200
All current directors and executive officers as a group (9 persons) ⁽⁵⁾	1,591,017	5.7	%	368,746	46,382
Stephen L. Domenik ⁽⁴⁾						315,359	1.1	%	43,750	—
Bruce A. Walicek ⁽⁵⁾						701,371	2.4	%	—	—
All current directors and executive officers as a group (6 persons) ⁽⁶⁾						1,330,917	4.5	%	372,080	129,952


*	Less than 1%.

(1)

Unless otherwise indicated in these footnotes, each of the beneficial owners listed has, to our knowledge, sole investment and voting power with respect to the indicated shares of common stock, subject to community property laws, where applicable. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each individual listed above is c/o Pixelworks, Inc., 224 Airport Parkway, Ste. 400, San Jose, California 95110.


(2)	Based on schedule 13G/A filed on ~~February 10, 2016~~January 4, 2017 by Mr. John A. Kryzanowski who reported beneficial ownership with respect to, and has voting and dispositive power over, ~~2,733,900~~2,860,000 shares. The address of the reporting persons is c/o Shartsis Friese LLP, One Maritime Plaza, 18th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111.


(3)	Based on schedule 13G/A filed on February 2, 2017 by Heartland Advisors, Inc. and William J. Nasgovitz who reported beneficial ownership with respect to, and have voting and dispositive power over, 2,250,000 shares. The address of the reporting persons is 789 North Water Street Milwaukee, WI 53202.


(4)	Effective ~~April 6,~~November 14, 2016, ~~Todd A. DeBonis was appointed as a member of our~~Stephen L. Domenik resigned from the Board.


~~(4)~~(5)	Effective February 1, 2016, Bruce A. Walicek resigned from his positions as CEO and as a member of the Board.

~~(5)~~(6)

Includes all persons named under "Directors, Nominees and Named Executive Officers" except Stephen L. Domenik and Bruce A. Walicek. The executive officers as of March ~~18, 2016~~17, 2017 were ~~Stephen L. Domenik, Interim CEO,~~Todd A. DeBonis, President and Chief Executive Officer and Steven L. Moore, Chief Financial ~~Officer and Todd A. DeBonis, Chief Operating~~ Officer. Mr. ~~Domenik and Mr.~~ DeBonis ~~are~~is also ~~directors~~a Director of Pixelworks, Inc.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, Directors, and persons who own more than 10% of registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with the SEC. Officers, Directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required to furnish us with copies of all Forms 3, 4 and 5 they file.

Based solely on our review of Forms 3 and 4, and any amendments thereto, furnished to the Company and written representations from reporting persons, we believe that during ~~2015,~~2016, all filing requirements applicable to our executive officers, Directors and ~~Directors~~greater than 10% shareholders under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, were met in a timely manner.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

Historically, we have not entered into transactions with related persons. Other than the compensation arrangements with Directors and executive officers described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, during the year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, there were no relationships or transactions, nor are there any currently proposed transactions in which:

we have been or are to be a participant;

the amount involved exceeds or will exceed $120,000; and

any of our Directors, nominees for Director, executive officers or beneficial holders of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any immediate family member of or person sharing the household with any of these individuals (other than tenants or employees); had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Indemnification Agreements

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our current Directors and executive officers. These agreements require us to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted under Oregon law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to us, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. We also intend to enter into indemnification agreements with our future ~~directors~~Directors and executive officers.

~~2016 Employment-Related Agreements~~

On February 1, 2016, we entered into an employment agreement with Stephen L. Domenik, our Interim CEO. The terms of this employment agreement are discussed below under “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Activity in 2016.”

On February 1, 2016, we entered into a separation and consulting agreement with Bruce A. Walicek, our former CEO, which provided for post-termination employment benefits. The terms of this separation and consulting agreement are discussed below under “Executive Compensation — Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Procedures for Approval of Related Party Transactions

In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing all related party transactions for potential conflicts of interest. The Company will not enter into any related party transactions without prior Audit Committee approval or ratification. Related party transactions are those that are required to be disclosed under applicable SEC rules. Currently, this review and approval requirement applies to any transaction in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any of the following persons will have a direct or indirect material interest: (a) any of our Directors or executive officers, (b) any nominee for election as a Director, (c) any security holder who is known to us to own of record or beneficially more than five percent of our common stock, or (d) any member of the immediate family of any of the persons described in the foregoing clauses (a) through (c).

In the event that management becomes aware of any related person transaction, management will present information regarding the proposed transaction to the Audit Committee for review. In its review, the Audit Committee will take into account any information regarding the transaction or related person that would be material to investors in light of the particular circumstances, which information may include the following:

The related person’s interest in the transaction;

The impact on a Director’s independence;

The approximate dollar value of the amount involved in the transaction;

The approximate dollar value of the amount of the related person’s interest in the transaction;

Whether the transaction was undertaken in the ordinary course of business;

Whether the terms of the transaction are no less favorable to the Company than terms that could have been reached with an unrelated party;

The availability of other sources for comparable products or services; and

The purpose, and potential benefits to the Company, of the transaction.

~~PROPOSAL NO. 4: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~

We are asking shareholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the related compensation tables and narrative.

As described in the “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement, the Compensation Committee has structured our executive compensation program to achieve the following key objectives:

Pay for performance: Achieved by linking components of executive compensation to individual contributions as well as corporate results. Further, long-term incentive awards, granted in the form of stock options or restricted stock awards, are designed to reward executive officers for the creation of long-term shareholder value.

~~Recognize fiscal responsibility and corporate stewardship: Achieved by providing limited perquisites and double trigger change in control benefits and no tax gross-ups.~~

~~Attract and motivate the best executives to the Company: Achieved by creating compensation packages that are at the midpoint of comparable companies with which we compete for executive talent.~~

We urge shareholders to read the “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” which describes in more detail how our executive compensation policies and procedures operate and are designed to achieve our compensation objectives, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and related compensation tables and narrative, which provide detailed information on the compensation of our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors believe that the policies and procedures articulated in the “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis” are effective in achieving our goals and that the compensation of our named executive officers reported in this proxy statement has supported and contributed to our success.

~~In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, and as a matter of good corporate governance, we are asking shareholders to approve the following advisory resolution at the Annual Meeting:~~

RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Pixelworks, Inc. (the "Company") approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other compensation-related tables, notes and narrative in the Proxy Statement for the Company's 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

This advisory resolution, commonly referred to as a "say-on-pay" resolution, is non-binding on the Board. Although non-binding, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions regarding executive compensation programs. Consistent with the shareholders’ 2013 advisory vote on the frequency of holding an advisory vote on Pixelworks’ executive compensation, we are seeking an advisory vote on executive compensation every three years until the next required shareholder vote on the frequency of shareholder votes on executive compensation.

~~THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A~~

~~VOTE FOR APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~

~~AS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.~~

INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth, as of March ~~18, 2016,~~17, 2017, information about the executive officers of the Company.



Name	Age	Position
~~Stephen L. Domenik~~Todd A. DeBonis	6452	~~Interim~~President and CEO
Steven L. Moore	6162	Vice President, CFO, Secretary and Treasurer
~~Todd A. DeBonis~~	51	~~Chief Operating Officer~~

The information provided below is biographical information about each of our executive officers as of March ~~18, 2016.~~17, 2017.

~~STEPHEN L. DOMENIK~~TODD A. DEBONIS — Information concerning Mr. ~~Domenik~~DeBonis is set forth under “Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors.”

STEVEN L. MOORE joined Pixelworks in July 2007 as Vice President, CFO, Secretary and Treasurer. Prior to joining Pixelworks, Mr. Moore served as Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer at Adept Technology, Inc., a publicly traded industrial robotics company, from June 2006 to July 2007. From June 2003 to June 2006, he held the position of Chief Financial Officer at SCM Microsystems, Inc., a publicly traded security/access control products company. From March 2000 to September 2002, Mr. Moore was Vice President of Finance at Virata Corporation, a publicly-traded semiconductor company. Prior to his service at Virata, Mr. Moore was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Health Systems Design Corporation, a publicly traded managed care information systems software company. Mr. Moore holds a B.A. in Economics from the University of Colorado.

~~TODD A. DEBONIS~~ ~~— Information concerning Mr. DeBonis is set forth under “Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors.”~~

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be furnished in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.



	Respectfully submitted,

	Richard L. Sanquini, Chairman
	~~Mark A. Christensen~~C. Scott Gibson
	~~C. Scott Gibson~~David J. Tupman

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the material elements of compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the Company’s ~~CEO and the Company’s CFO, who were the Company's only named~~executive officers. Our executive officers in ~~2015.~~2016 were:

•Todd A. DeBonis, President and CEO

•Steven L. Moore, Vice President, CFO, Secretary and Treasurer

•Stephen L. Domenik, Former Interim CEO

•Bruce A. Walicek, Former President and CEO

These individuals are listed in the “Summary Compensation Table” below and referred to in this Proxy Statement as the "Named Executive Officers."

Recap of Fiscal Year 2016

We believe that the compensation of our named executive officers should facilitate the achievement of annual corporate goals as well as the performance of long-term business objectives. For 2016 compared with 2015, our revenue declined by 10% which was primarily due to our customers' efforts to adjust inventory levels. Because of the softer demand environment during fiscal 2016, we maintained a strong focus on corporate-wide expense controls and diligent cash management. As a result, we decreased operating expenses by 9.4%, which included one-time restructuring charges of $2.6 million associated with employee severance and benefits.

Revenue is one of the performance metrics used to determine payout of incentive compensation under our Senior Management Bonus Plan. As described in more detail below in the section entitled, "Annual Cash Incentives" each of the performance metrics is individually evaluated and payout is made only if the minimum threshold for each is met. We achieved revenue of $53 million in 2016. Because the minimum threshold of $55 million in revenue was not met, our Named Executive Officers did not receive any payout under the Senior Management Bonus Plan.

Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is directly responsible for overseeing the Company’s compensation programs and may not delegate its authority in this respect to any other persons. Annually, the Compensation Committee evaluates the performance of our CEO and other executive officers and determines compensation in light of the goals and objectives of the compensation program for that year. As part of that responsibility, the Compensation Committee determines all compensation for the Company’s Named Executive Officers. For executive officers other than the CEO, the Compensation Committee considers the recommendation of the CEO in making its compensation determinations.

From time to time, the Compensation Committee retains the services of independent compensation consultants to review a wide variety of factors relevant to CEO, executive and Director compensation, trends in CEO, executive and Director compensation, and the identification of relevant peer companies. The Compensation Committee makes all determinations regarding the engagement, fees, services of our compensation consultants, and our compensation consultants report directly to our Compensation Committee. During ~~2015,~~2016, the Compensation Committee directly engaged Compensia, an independent compensation consultant, (the "Compensation Consultant") to provide executive compensation consulting services which included a review of our executive compensation programs, an update as to executive compensation trends generally and among our peer companies, and recommendations regarding our compensation programs. The Compensation Committee considered the Compensation Consultant’s independence by taking into account the factors prescribed by the NASDAQ listing rules. Based on such evaluation, the Committee determined that no conflict of interest exists. In 2015, the Compensation Committee also retained the Compensation Consultant to review Director compensation. The Compensation Consultant did not provide any other services to the Company and did not provide services in excess of $120,000. In connection with its engagement of the Compensation Consultant, the Compensation Committee considered various factors bearing upon the Compensation Consultant’s independence prescribed by the NASDAQ listing rules including, but not limited to, the amount of fees paid to the Compensation Consultant, its policies and procedures designed to prevent conflicts of interest, and the existence of any business or personal relationship that could impact independence. After reviewing these and other factors, the Compensation Committee determined that the Compensation Consultant was independent and that its engagement did not present any conflicts of interest.

Special Circumstances Relating to New CEO Hire

Mr. DeBonis joined the Company on January 4, 2016 as Executive Vice President, Sales, Marketing & Business Development, at which time he was awarded stock options, consistent with the Company's general approach with respect to senior management new hires. On February 1, 2016, Bruce Walicek resigned from his positions as CEO and as a member of the Board. The Board commenced efforts to promptly identify and select a candidate to succeed Mr. Walicek as CEO. Until a candidate was selected, Stephen Domenik, a member of the Board, was appointed Interim CEO. After a comprehensive search, the Board identified Mr. DeBonis as the best candidate with the requisite experience for the position as CEO.

The Compensation Committee received input from its Compensation Consultant to design a competitive, market-based compensation package appropriate for a senior executive with Mr. DeBonis' skills and experience, and with a vesting plan that linked much of his compensation to long-term service and the creation of shareholder value. In determining the equity portion of Mr. DeBonis' compensation package, the Compensation Committee took into account the general requirements to attract a new CEO candidate and awarded the majority of his compensation in the form of RSUs with vesting over three years to align his interests with those of the Company's shareholders. The size of an equity award required to attract a qualified CEO is typically greater than what we would typically contemplate awarding to a continuing employee on an annual basis. In addition, Mr. DeBonis was awarded a one-time bonus upon his appointment as CEO. Based on the above information, the compensation package reported for Mr. DeBonis' first year of service may not be indicative of compensation that will be reported for future years. We expect bonus payments in the future to be made only under the Senior Management Bonus Plan discussed below under the section entitled "Annual Cash Incentives" and we expect equity awards to be only in the form of RSU's.

In determining the appropriate level of compensation for Mr. Domenik as the Interim CEO, the Compensation Committee considered Mr. Domenik’s experience and expected job responsibilities, current compensation practices among comparable companies for comparable positions, and the expected time-frame of Mr. Domenik’s service. As a result, the Compensation Committee determined to set Mr. Domenik’s annual base salary at the same level as the Company had been paying to Mr. Walicek, which they determined to be a reasonable and appropriate level for the Company’s CEO, and determined to grant him a number of options consistent with the Company’s general approach with respect to senior management new hires, adjusted to account for the anticipated shorter term of service.

Executive Compensation Program Objectives and Philosophy

The objectives of the Company’s executive compensation program are as follows:


1.	Attract and motivate the best executives to the Company;


2.	Reflect our pay for performance philosophy;


3.	Reward executives for their contributions to the Company’s strategic and financial success and for creating shareholder value; and


4.	Recognize fiscal responsibility and corporate stewardship.

The Compensation Committee’s executive compensation decisions are based on the following core principles:


1.	Link pay to performance. The components of our executive compensation package are linked to individual contribution as well as corporate results. Long-term incentive awards, granted in the form of stock options or restricted stock unit awards, are designed to reward executive officers for the creation of long-term shareholder value.


2.	Provide competitive compensation. Our compensation programs are designed to be competitive within the various markets in which we compete for executive talent.


3.	Establish levels of compensation that are appropriate for the size and financial condition of the Company.

Data Considered in Determining Executive Compensation

In establishing executive compensation, the Compensation Committee does not engage in formal benchmarking activities but does review the compensation practices of other companies in the semiconductor industry and companies with similar total revenue to ours as background information for its compensation decisions. Specifically, when necessary, the Compensation Committee reviews third-party broad-based executive survey data to gain a general understanding of current compensation practices among comparable companies for comparable positions. The results of such a review, however, are only some of many other factors, including the qualitative factors described below, that are evaluated by the Compensation Committee. No specific weight is attached to any one factor and the emphasis placed on each factor may vary among individuals. As noted below, the target bonus rates for the Named Executive Officers were the same in ~~2015~~2016 as they were in ~~2014.~~2015.

Shareholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

At our ~~2013~~2016 annual meeting of shareholders, our shareholders cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers (a “say-on-pay” vote). A ~~substantial~~ majority ~~(97.5%~~(78%) of the votes cast at that meeting (including abstentions but excluding broker non-votes) approved, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers that was set forth in the related proxy statement. In evaluating our executive compensation program following this advisory vote, the Compensation Committee has considered the results of the say-on-pay vote as well as other factors discussed in this Compensation Discussion & Analysis. While each of these factors informed the Compensation Committee’s decisions regarding the compensation of our named executive officers, in light of the ~~high level of~~ shareholder support received in ~~2013,~~2016 and special circumstances related to new hire CEO, the Compensation Committee has not implemented significant changes to our executive compensation program since that time.

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program consists of fixed and variable cash compensation and equity-based compensation (together with cash compensation, “total direct compensation”), as well as severance and change of control benefits. When setting executive compensation, the Compensation Committee does not target a specific mix of fixed and variable compensation; however, the Compensation Committee does believe that variable cash compensation and equity-based compensation should constitute a significant portion of total compensation and that compensation should vary based on performance.

Additionally, the Compensation Committee does not target a specific mix of short-term variable compensation and long-term variable compensation. Typically, cash incentives are awarded after consideration of the accomplishment of financial, product and market development goals, and long-term incentives are aimed at aligning the interests of our Named Executive Officers with those of shareholders by focusing on long-term growth and stock performance. The Compensation Committee views all of these objectives as critical.

The following narrative describes each component of our executive compensation program, explains why each is included in the program and provides details of certain specific compensation arrangements for the Named Executive Officers for fiscal year ~~2015.~~2016.

Base Salaries

The Compensation Committee believes that it is appropriate for our executive officers to receive a competitive level of ~~guaranteed~~fixed compensation in the form of a base salary. Base salaries provide a stable source of fixed income for the executive officers and help promote retention.

~~With the exception of Mr. Walicek’s Employment Agreement (see "Description of Mr. Walicek's Employment Agreement — Salary and Bonus Amounts," below) none~~None of our Named Executive Officers have employment agreements or other contractual rights to receive fixed base salaries. Instead, base salaries for the Named Executive Officers are determined by the Compensation Committee based on its annual review. When determining the appropriate base salary for each executive, the Compensation Committee considers a variety of factors, such as the executive’s experience, job responsibilities and performance, the base salaries paid for similar positions with respect to both comparable companies and the Compensation Committee’s general knowledge of the industry, the Company’s financial performance and position, and recommendations from the CEO (as to executive officers other than himself). No specific performance goals or weightings are attached to any of these factors in establishing base salaries, and the emphasis placed on each factor may differ from individual to individual.

The base salary earned by each Named Executive Officer during ~~2015~~2016 is reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” below.

Annual Cash Incentives

The Named Executive Officers are generally eligible to receive cash bonuses each year as determined by the Compensation Committee. In accordance with our compensation program, objectives related to rewarding the Named Executive Officers for their contributions to the Company’s strategic and financial success, the Compensation Committee’s intent is to set challenging yet attainable financial and operational goals for the Named Executive Officers to work toward in the coming year. The ~~2015~~2016 target ~~bonus~~bonuses for Mr. DeBonis, Mr. Domenik and Mr. Walicek ~~was~~were equal to 100% of ~~his~~their annual base ~~salary~~salaries (subject to proration and eligibility provisions) and the ~~2015~~2016 target bonus for Mr. Moore was equal to 50% of his annual base salary. Target bonus rates were unchanged from their levels in ~~2014.~~2015.

On December 29, 2009, the Compensation Committee approved the form of the Company’s Senior Management Bonus Plan (the “Plan”). Under the Plan, annual bonuses for Named Executive Officers are based on the attainment of specific goals, ~~related~~as established by the Compensation Committee from year to year, that relate to the following performance measures:

Revenue;


•	Non-GAAP earnings⁽¹⁾ before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“adjusted EBITDA”); and

Achievement of specified operational objectives.

⁽¹⁾ Our ~~2015~~2016 Non-GAAP earnings differ from our ~~2015~~2016 GAAP earnings due to the exclusion of stock-based compensation expense and ~~additional amortization of a non-cancelable prepaid royalty.~~restructuring expense.

Additionally the Plan provides that no bonus will be paid under the Plan unless minimum threshold targets for the revenue and adjusted EBITDA performance measures are achieved.

For 2016, the Compensation Committee determined that optimizing sales and profitability for our shareholders were the critical measures for managements’ performance, and it selected no operational objectives for the Plan. The specific performance goals for fiscal year ~~2015~~2016 were the following:

~~Revenue;~~Revenue, to be used solely for determining threshold eligibility for bonuses under the Plan as is described above;

Adjusted ~~EBITDA.~~EBITDA, to be used both for determining eligibility for bonuses under the Plan and, should the threshold performance targets be achieved, for calculating the Plan’s bonus payments (ranging from 0-100% of target bonus rates based on level of adjusted EBITDA attained up to the annual target of $13 million).

During ~~2015,~~2016, the minimum threshold ~~target~~ of ~~$67~~positive adjusted EBITDA was achieved but the minimum threshold of $55 million annual revenue was not achieved and thus no bonus amounts were awarded under the Plan. ~~Since~~The Compensation Committee believes that the ~~minimum threshold target~~Plan’s revenue and adjusted EBITDA thresholds for ~~revenue was not achieved,~~2016 were appropriate based on their review of the Company’s operating plan for 2016, the Company’s historical performance and the industry outlook at the relevant time. The Compensation Committee evaluates the Plan’s threshold and performance goals closely each year to secure a proper level of rigor to align with ~~respect to 2015 operational objectives was not evaluated by the Compensation Committee.~~our pay for performance philosophy.

Long-Term Equity Awards

The Compensation Committee believes that the Named Executive Officers' long-term compensation should be directly linked to the value provided to shareholders. In ~~2015,~~2016, the Named Executive Officers' long-term compensation was awarded in the form of stock options and RSUs. The RSUs granted in ~~2015~~2016 vest over a three-year period and stock options generally vest over a three- or four- year period and thus encourage long-term perspective and retention.

The Compensation Committee determines the size and frequency of each Named Executive Officer's equity awards annually by assessing the relative position and responsibilities of each executive, individual performance of each executive, anticipated contributions of each executive to the Company, previous equity-based awards granted to such executive, and awards given to similar positions among comparable companies (with no specific performance goals or weightings assigned to the foregoing factors). In general, executive officers receive an initial grant of equity on their date of hire. The Compensation Committee may grant additional equity awards to recognize increased responsibilities or special contributions, to retain executives or to recognize other special circumstances. Currently, our long-term equity awards are time-based which is consistent with practices among our peer group.

On ~~May 18, 2015,~~April 21, 2016, the Compensation Committee awarded ~~RSUs as follows:~~

Mr. ~~Walicek received~~Moore an award of ~~120,000~~60,000 RSUs. The RSUs ~~and Mr. Moore received an award of 45,000 RSUs.~~

~~Mr. Walicek’s RSUs were originally scheduled to~~will vest 33% on ~~February 16, 2016,~~May 15, 2017, 33% on ~~February~~May 15, ~~2017~~2018 and 34% on ~~February~~May 15, ~~2018,~~2019, subject to continued service through each vesting date.

In connection with his appointment as our President and Chief Executive Officer on April 27, 2016, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Walicek's award and vesting schedule were modified per the terms of the February 1, 2016 Separation and Consulting Agreement, as further described in this Proxy Statement under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control,” such that theDeBonis 150,000 RSUs. The RSUs vested with respect to 6,600 shares on February 29, 2016 and will vest with respect to 6,600 shares on the last calendar day of each month from March 2016 through July 2016, subject to Mr. Walicek's continued service as a consultant. The remaining units were canceled on February 1, 2016.

~~Mr. Moore's RSUs vested 33% on February 16, 2016 and~~ will vest 33% on ~~February~~May 15, 2017, 33% on May 15, 2018 and 34% on ~~February~~May 15, ~~2018,~~2019, subject to continued service through each vesting date. In connection with his hiring as our Executive Vice President, Sales, Marketing & Business Development on January 4, 2016, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. DeBonis 350,000 stock options. The stock options vest 25% on January 31, 2017, followed by monthly vesting on a straight-line basis over a three year period. The rationale in support of these two grants is included above in the section above entitled "Special Circumstances Relating to New CEO Hire."

In connection with his appointment as our Interim Chief Executive Officer on February 1, 2016, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Domenik 43,750 stock options. The stock options vested monthly on a straight-line basis over a six-month period.

The ~~2015~~2016 stock awards described above were granted under the 2006 Plan and are included in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards — ~~2015”~~2016” table below.

Severance Benefits Payable Upon Termination or Change in Control

Individual agreements with each Named Executive Officer provide for severance benefits payable upon certain involuntary terminations of their employment with the Company. The benefits may be provided to incentivize executives to join the Company, to incentivize executives to remain with the Company, or to compensate executives when they are asked to take on new or extraordinary responsibilities. The Compensation Committee believes that the benefits provided are comparable with those provided to individuals in similar positions at similar companies.

Additionally, the Compensation Committee believes that the occurrence, or potential occurrence, of a change of control transaction will create uncertainty regarding the continued employment of executives. To encourage executives to remain employed with the Company during an important time when their prospects for continued employment following the transaction are often uncertain, the Company provides executives with severance benefits if their employment is involuntarily terminated in connection with a change of control (i.e. double trigger).

A description of the specific severance benefits provided for each Named Executive Officer is included below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Other Compensation ~~Activity in 2016~~

~~On February 1, 2016, in connection with his appointment as our Interim CEO, Stephen Domenik, a current Director~~Considerations and a Director nominee, entered into an employment agreement with us. This employment agreement provided that Mr. Domenik would receive a base salary, initially set at an annualized amount of $375,000, and would be eligible to participate in a cash bonus program in calendar year 2016 on terms which may be established by the Compensation Committee.

On February 1, 2016, Todd A. DeBonis was appointed as our Chief Operating Officer and the terms of his pre-existing offer letter, dated December 9, 2015 remained in effect. The offer letter provided that Mr. DeBonis would receive an annual base salary, initially set at an annualized amount of $295,000, and would be eligible to participate in a cash bonus program in calendar year 2016 on terms which may be established by the Compensation Committee. Additionally, on January 4, 2016, Mr. DeBonis entered into a change of control and severance agreement with us. A description of the terms of such agreement is included below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”Policies

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation over $1,000,000 paid to the CEO and certain other executive officers, unless certain performance and other requirements are met. Although components of our current executive compensation program do not qualify for exemption from the $1,000,000 deduction limit, we believe that a substantial portion of our current executive compensation program will be deductible under the $1,000,000 limit. We reserve the right to design programs that recognize a full range of performance criteria important to our success, even where the compensation paid under such programs may not be deductible. The Compensation Committee will continue to monitor the tax and other consequences of our executive compensation program as part of its primary objective of ensuring that compensation paid to our executive officers is reasonable, performance-based and consistent with the goals of Pixelworks and its shareholders.

Assessment of Risk

The Compensation Committee annually reviews the elements of compensation for our Named Executive Officers to determine whether any portion of the overall program encourages excessive risk taking. The Compensation Committee’s current assessment is that although the majority of compensation provided to our Named Executive Officers is performance-based, our compensation programs do not encourage excessive or unnecessary risk taking. The Compensation Committee believes that the design of these compensation programs encourages our Named Executive Officers to remain focused on both short-term and long-term strategic goals. Safeguards integrated into the Company’s compensation practices include: (1) the balance of short-term and long-term incentive compensation; (2) the use of time-based vesting criteria in long-term incentive awards to align holders’ interests with the Company’s prospects; (3) the use of multiple performance metrics in the annual cash incentive plan, each linked to overall Company progress as opposed to narrow targets; (4) the limitation of maximum payouts under our annual incentive program as well as the reservation of Compensation Committee negative discretion to reduce amounts payable thereunder; and (5) the limitation on annual awards under the Company’s stock incentive plan.

Stock Ownership, Holding or Retention Guidelines

There are currently no equity ownership, holding or retention requirements or guidelines that our Named Executive Officers or other employees must meet or maintain.

Policy Against Hedging

Our Policy Against Disclosure of Confidential Information and Insider Trading prohibits directors, officers and employees from engaging in any form of hedging transactions in our stock, pledging our stock as collateral for a loan, trading in our securities on a short-term basis, purchases of our securities on margin, short sales of our securities and buying or selling puts or calls, or their equivalent positions, on our securities.

Policy Regarding Recoupments

We do not currently have a formal policy requiring a fixed course of action with respect to compensation adjustments, or “clawbacks”, following later restatements of financial results. Under those circumstances, our Board or Compensation Committee would evaluate whether compensation adjustments were appropriate based upon the facts and circumstances surrounding the restatement, including the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and any policies adopted by our Board or Compensation Committee pursuant to Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Narrative to ~~2015~~2016 Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards

Please see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" above for a complete description of compensation plans pursuant to which the amounts listed under the ~~"2015~~"2016 Summary Compensation Table" and the "Grants of Plan-Based Awards — ~~2015"~~2016" table were paid or awarded and the criteria for such payment, including targets for payment of annual incentives, as well as performance criteria on which such payments were based. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis section also describes the equity awards. The vesting of option awards and RSUs are as described in the tables below.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation of our Named Executive Officers for services rendered during 2016, 2015 ~~2014~~ and ~~2013.~~2014. The Summary Compensation table should be read in conjunction with the tables and narrative descriptions that follow as well as the Compensation Discussion and Analysis previously presented.


Name and Position	Year	Salary ⁽¹⁾		Bonus ⁽²⁾		Option Awards ⁽³⁾		Stock Awards ⁽³⁾		Total		Year	Salary			Bonus ⁽¹⁾		Option Awards ⁽²⁾		Stock Awards ⁽²⁾				All Other ⁽⁴⁾		Total
Todd A. DeBonis												2016	$	351,500	⁽⁵⁾	$	105,000	$	520,555	$	315,000			$	—	$	1,292,055
President and CEO
Steven L. Moore												2016	275,000			—		—		130,800				—		405,800
Vice President, CFO, Secretary and Treasurer												2015	275,000			—		—		195,750				—		470,750
												2014	275,000			26,464		—		278,950				—		580,414
Stephen L. Domenik⁽³⁾												2016	96,108			—		56,079		—				—		152,187
Former Interim CEO
Bruce A. Walicek⁽⁴⁾	2015	$	375,000	$	—	$	—	$	522,000	$	897,000	2016	87,981			—		—		(482,686		)	⁽⁶⁾	763,640		368,929
Former President and CEO	2014	375,000		72,174		—		797,000		1,244,174		2015	375,000			—		—		522,000				—		897,000
	2013	334,519		—		—		724,350		1,058,869		2014	375,000			72,174		—		797,000				—		1,244,174
Steven L. Moore	2015	275,000		—		—		195,750		470,750
Vice President, CFO, Secretary and Treasurer	2014	275,000		26,464		—		278,950		580,414
	2013	255,096		7,500		—		219,500		482,096


(1)	~~Each Named Executive Officer received a salary increase effective November 1, 2013~~Mr. Moore and ~~their 2013 salaries reflect this increase.~~

~~(2)~~

~~Each Named Executive Officer~~Mr. Walicek each earned a bonus under the Company's Senior Management Bonus Plan in 2014. ~~During 2013,~~ Mr. ~~Moore received~~DeBonis was awarded a ~~discretionary cash~~ bonus ~~of $7,500 which was paid in recognition of~~upon his ~~outstanding contributions~~appointment to CEO on ~~intellectual property licensing agreements, co-development arrangements with customers, and our 2013 underwritten registered equity offering.~~April 27, 2017.

~~(3)~~(2)

~~This~~Except as noted below, this column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of RSU and stock option awards granted during the applicable year calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For additional information on the valuation assumptions used for the grants, see Note 89 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. See the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards — ~~2015”~~2016” table below for information on equity awards granted to the Named Executive Officers in ~~2015.~~2016.


(3)	Mr. Domenik's annual base salary was set at $375,000, consistent with the annual base salary of Mr. Walicek, our former President and CEO. Effective April 26, 2016, Mr. Domenik resigned from his position as Interim CEO.

(4)

Effective February 1, 2016, ~~Bruce A.~~Mr. Walicek resigned from his positions as CEO and as a member of the Board. Mr. Walicek received $731,250 in cash severance and termination notice payments and $32,390 in healthcare continuation benefits in accordance with the terms of his separation agreement. See the description below under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control - The Walicek Separation Agreement” for more information.


(5)	This amount reflects the pro-rated salary earned by Mr. DeBonis as our Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President, Sales, Marketing & Business Development from January 2016 through April 2017, and the pro-rated salary earned by Mr. DeBonis as our Chief Executive Officer beginning in April 2016, at which time his annual base salary was set at $400,000.

(6)

Reflects the sum of (a) ($230,045), which is the deemed incremental fair value of the consulting agreement-related amendments to 72,600 of Mr. Walicek’s previously granted RSU awards, plus (b) ($252,639), which is the aggregate grant date fair value of RSU awards previously expensed and reported in prior Summary Compensation Table disclosure but that was reversed upon the forfeiture of such RSU awards in connection with Mr. Walicek’s resignation from his position as CEO. The deemed incremental fair value does not reflect any additional equity grants or awards, but instead relates to the February 1, 2016 Separation and Consulting Agreement’s provision that Mr. Walicek have the opportunity for continued vesting in up to 72,600 RSUs for service during his six-month post-employment consulting term. The incremental fair value was calculated as of the modification date in accordance with ASC 718 and was less than the grant date fair value.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards — ~~2015~~2016

The following table sets forth information concerning grants of plan-based awards to our Named Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.


		Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards ⁽²⁾			Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards ⁽²⁾			All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock (#)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards ⁽⁴⁾		Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards ⁽²⁾			All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock (#)			All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)			Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) ⁽³⁾		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ⁽⁴⁾
Name	Grant Date ⁽¹⁾	Threshold ($)	Target ($)	Maximum ($) ⁽³⁾	Threshold ($)	Target ($)	Maximum ($) ⁽³⁾	All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock (#)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards ⁽⁴⁾	Grant Date ⁽¹⁾	Threshold ($)	Target ($)	Maximum ($) ⁽³⁾							Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) ⁽³⁾		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ⁽⁴⁾
Bruce A. Walicek	5/18/2015	—	—	—	—	—	—	120,000	⁽⁵⁾	522,000
Todd A. DeBonis											4/27/2016	—	—	—	All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock (#)	150,000		⁽⁵⁾	—			—		315,000
											1/4/2016	—	—	—	—			350,000		⁽⁶⁾	2.46		520,555
	N/A	—	375,000	—	—	—	—	—		—	N/A	—	400,000	—	—			—			—		—
Steven L. Moore	5/18/2015	—	—	—	—	—	—	45,000	⁽⁶⁾	195,750	4/21/2016	—	—	—	60,000		⁽⁷⁾	—			—		130,800
	N/A	—	137,500	—	—	—	—	—		—	N/A	—	137,500	—	—			—			—		—
Stephen L. Domenik											2/1/2016	—	375,000	—	—			43,750		⁽⁸⁾	2.12		56,079
Bruce A. Walicek											N/A	—	375,000	—	—			—			—		—


(1)	Represents the grant date for equity-based awards reported in the table.

(2)

Represents the threshold, target and maximum bonuses payable under the Company’s ~~2015~~2016 Senior Management Bonus Plan (the ~~"2015~~"2016 Senior Management Plan"). prior to any applicable proration for an incomplete year of service. The 2016 Senior Management Plan’s parameters provided for potential payments from 0 to 100% of the applicable target amount, with no out-performance opportunity. No amounts were payable under this plan in ~~2015.~~2016.


(3)	~~The 2015 Senior Management Plan payout amounts were capped at $1.4 million.~~Each option reported in the table was granted with a per-share exercise price equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company's common stock on the grant date.

(4)

Represents the grant date fair value of stock and option awards calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For additional information on the valuation assumptions used for the grants, see Note 89 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. These amounts reflect the grant date fair value of the award and do not correspond to the actual value that will be realized.

(5)

The RSUs were ~~originally scheduled~~awarded to Mr. DeBonis in connection with his appointment as our President and Chief Executive Officer. The RSUs will vest 33% on ~~February 16, 2016,~~May 15, 2017, 33% on ~~February~~May 15, ~~2017~~2018 and 34% on ~~February~~May 15, ~~2018,~~2019, subject to continued service through each vesting date. Mr. Walicek's award and vesting schedule were modified per the terms of the February 1, 2016 separation and consulting agreement such that the RSUs vested with respect to 6,600 shares on February 29, 2016, and will vest with respect to 6,600 shares on the last calendar day of each month from March 2016 through July 2016, subject to Mr. Walicek's continued service as a consultant. The remaining units were canceled on February 1, 2016.


(6)	The options were awarded to Mr. DeBonis in connection with his hiring as our Executive Vice President, Sales, Marketing & Business Development on January 4, 2016. The stock options vest 25% on January 31, 2017, followed by monthly vesting on a straight-line basis over a three-year period.


(7)	The RSUs ~~vested 33% on February 16, 2016 and~~were awarded to Mr. Moore in connection with the Company’s annual grants to executives. The RSUs will vest 33% on ~~February~~May 15, 2017, 33% on May 15, 2018 and 34% on May 15, 2019, subject to continued service through each vesting date.


(8)	The options were awarded to Mr. Domenik in connection with his appointment as our Interim Chief Executive Officer on February ~~15, 2018.~~1, 2016. The stock options vested monthly on a straight-line basis over a six-month period.

Additional Description of Plan-Based Awards

Each of the equity incentive awards reported in the above table was granted under, and is subject to, the terms of the Company’s 2006 Plan. The 2006 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee and the Compensation Committee has authority to interpret the plan provisions and make all required determinations under the plan. Awards granted under the plan are generally only transferable to a beneficiary of a Named Executive Officer upon his death or, in certain cases, to family members for tax or estate planning purposes.

Under the terms of the 2006 Plan, in the event of a merger or the sale of substantially all of our assets, each Named Executive Officer’s outstanding awards granted under the plan will be assumed or an equivalent award will be substituted therefor by the successor entity, unless the Compensation Committee provides that outstanding awards will become fully vested in lieu of being assumed.

In addition, each Named Executive Officer may be entitled to accelerated vesting of his outstanding equity-based awards upon certain terminations of his employment with the Company and/or a change of control of the Company. The terms of this accelerated vesting are described in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section below.

The ~~RSUs~~RSU and option awards granted to Named Executive Officers during ~~2015~~2016 do not include any dividend rights.

~~Description of Mr. Walicek’s Employment Agreement — Salary and Bonus Amounts~~

We and Mr. Walicek entered into the 2012 Executive Employment Agreement, effective November 2, 2012 (the "Walicek Employment Agreement"). The Walicek Employment Agreement did not have a specified term. The Walicek Employment Agreement provided for Mr. Walicek to receive an annual base salary of $325,000 subject to periodic review by the Compensation Committee. The Walicek Employment Agreement also provided for Mr. Walicek to participate in the Company’s annual bonus program as established by the Compensation Committee and to be eligible to receive equity awards as determined by the Compensation Committee. The Walicek Employment Agreement terminated February 1, 2016 and the parties entered into the Separation and Consulting Agreement dated February 1, 2016 (the “Walicek Separation Agreement”). Provisions of the Walicek Employment Agreement relating to post-termination employment benefits, as well as the Walicek Separation Agreement and the severance agreement we have entered into with Mr. Moore, are discussed below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Outstanding Equity Awards at ~~2015~~2016 Fiscal Year-End

The following tables present option and restricted stock awards outstanding for the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.


	Option Awards					Stock Awards			Option Awards					Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable	Option exercise price per share ($)	Option expiration date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (#)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) ⁽¹⁾	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable		Option exercise price per share ($)	Option expiration date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (#)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) ⁽¹⁾
Bruce A. Walicek	100,000		—	3.13	2/10/2016	—		—
	3,333	⁽²⁾	—	9.00	5/23/2016	—		—
	125,000		—	3.48	2/10/2017	—		—
	3,333	⁽²⁾	—	4.14	5/22/2017	—		—
	168,333		—	2.31	1/1/2018	—		—
	31,666		—	2.28	1/1/2018	—		—
	100,000		—	2.36	2/9/2018	—		—
	100,000		—	0.60	3/23/2019	—		—
Todd A. DeBonis									—	350,000	⁽²⁾	2.46	1/4/2022	—		—
	—		—	—	—	187,000	⁽³⁾	445,060	—	—		—	—	150,000	⁽³⁾	445,060
Steven L. Moore	60,000		—	3.13	2/10/2016	—		—	60,000	—		3.48	2/10/2017	—		—
	60,000		—	3.48	2/10/2017	—		—	66,666	—		5.25	7/18/2017	—		—
	66,666		—	5.25	7/18/2017	—		—	50,000	—		2.36	2/9/2018	—		—
	50,000		—	2.36	2/9/2018	—		—	16,666	—		2.28	2/28/2018	—		—
	16,666		—	2.28	2/28/2018	—		—	8,333	—		2.28	3/2/2018	—		—
	8,333		—	2.28	3/2/2018	—		—	100,000	—		0.60	3/23/2019	—		—
	100,000		—	0.60	3/23/2019	—		—	—	—		—	—	11,900	⁽⁴⁾	55,811
	—		—	—	—	23,450	⁽⁴⁾	55,811	—	—		—	—	30,150	⁽⁵⁾	107,100
	—		—	—	—	45,000	⁽⁵⁾	107,100	—	—		—	—	60,000	⁽³⁾	107,100
Stephen L. Domenik									43,750	—		2.12	11/17/2017	—		—
Bruce A. Walicek									100,000	—		2.36	2/1/2017	—		—


(1)	The market value of the shares is determined by multiplying the number of shares reported in the table by the closing price per common share of ~~$2.38~~our common stock of $2.80 on December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.


(2)	Options ~~were granted due to Mr. Walicek's service~~vest 25% on ~~the Board prior to him becoming our CEO.~~January 31, 2017, followed by monthly vesting thereafter through January 31, 2020.

(3)

RSUs ~~originally scheduled to~~ vest ~~with respect to 72,600 shares~~33% on ~~February 16, 2016, 73,600 shares on February~~May 15, 2017, 33% on May 15, 2018 and ~~40,800 shares~~34% on ~~February~~May 15, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the Walicek Separation Agreement, the RSUs vest with respect to 12,100 shares on the last calendar day of each month from February 2016 to July 2016, subject to continued service as a consultant. The remaining RSUs were canceled on February 1, 2016.2019.


(4)	RSUs vest ~~with respect to 11,550 shares on February 16, 2016 and with respect to 11,900 shares~~100% on February 15, 2017.


(5)	RSUs vest ~~33% on February 16, 2016, 33%~~with respect to 14,850 shares on February 15, 2017 and ~~34%~~with respect to 15,300 shares on February 15, 2018.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table presents information regarding the exercise of stock options by our Named Executive Officers and vesting of RSUs held by our Named Executive Officers for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.


Name	Option awards			Stock awards			Option awards				Stock awards
Name	Number of shares acquired on exercise (#)	Value realized on exercise ($)		Number of shares acquired on vesting (#) ⁽¹⁾	Value realized on vesting ($) ⁽²⁾		Number of shares acquired on exercise (#)		Value realized on exercise ($)		Number of shares acquired on vesting (#) ⁽¹⁾		Value realized on vesting ($) ⁽²⁾
Todd A. DeBonis							—		$	—	—		$	—
Steven L. Moore							—		—		30,300		109,375
Stephen L. Domenik							—		—		6,626	⁽³⁾	11,529
Bruce A. Walicek	—	$	—	94,875	$	348,150	299,999	⁽⁴⁾	855,129		72,600	⁽⁵⁾	146,289
Steven L. Moore	—	—		30,300	109,375

(1) With respect to RSUs vesting during a blackout period that precludes the RSU holder from trading shares of our stock, acquisition of the underlying shares will generally not occur on the vesting date but instead be deferred until the expiration of such blackout period as provided by the terms of the award agreement.

(2) Value realized is based on the fair market value per share of our common stock on the vesting date, which equals the closing market price of our common stock on the vesting date.

(3) Reflects shares released upon vesting of RSUs granted for service as a Director, not for service as Interim CEO.

(4) Exercised post termination.

(5) Released post termination.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The Company has entered into the following arrangements with the Named Executive Officers that provide for severance benefits on certain terminations of employment. In each case, the severance benefits described below are contingent upon the individual providing a release of claims in favor of the Company.

~~The Walicek Employment~~Change of Control and Severance Agreement with Todd A. DeBonis

~~The Walicek Employment Agreement entitled Mr. Walicek to certain severance benefits subject to certain conditions. As of February 1,~~On January 4, 2016, the ~~Walicek Employment~~Company entered into a Change of Control and Severance Agreement ~~was superseded by the Walicek Separation Agreement.~~with Todd A. DeBonis (the "DeBonis Severance Agreement"). The ~~benefits described under this heading are therefore no longer available to Mr. Walicek.~~

~~The Walicek Employment~~DeBonis Severance Agreement ~~provided~~provides for certain benefits in the event of anMr. DeBonis’ “involuntary termination.” An “involuntary termination”~~, meaning~~ is a termination by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. ~~Walicek~~DeBonis for a “good reason” (as each of those terms is defined in the ~~Walicek Employment~~DeBonis Severance Agreement).

In the event ~~of an~~the involuntary termination occurs within six months prior to, or within twelve (12) months following, a ~~"change~~“change of ~~control"~~control” (as such term is defined in the ~~Walicek Employment~~DeBonis Severance Agreement), ~~the Walicek Employment Agreement provided for~~Mr. DeBonis will be entitled to the following benefits: (i) ~~severance pay consisting~~a lump sum cash payment equal to twelve (12) months of his base salary and the then-current year's target bonus as in effect as of the ~~higher~~date of ~~Mr. Walicek's annual base salary then~~such involuntary termination or, if greater, as in effect ~~for twelve months, or $325,000;~~immediately prior to the change of control; (ii) ~~severance pay consisting of the higher of Mr. Walicek's actual target bonus for the then-current year, or $325,000; (iii)~~ accelerated vesting of all ~~options~~outstanding equity awards granted to him by the Company prior to the change of control; and ~~RSU awards that are outstanding~~(iii) the same level of Company-paid health coverage and ~~unvested as of~~benefits at the ~~employment~~levels in effect on the day preceding the termination ~~date; and (iv) payment~~ of Mr. ~~Walicek's~~DeBonis until the earlier of when he (and any eligible dependents) is no longer eligible to receive continuation coverage pursuant to COBRA, ~~health insurance premiums for~~or twelve ~~months.~~(12) months from the date of termination. In the event of an involuntary termination that ~~occurred~~occurs within six months prior to a ~~“change~~change of ~~control”,~~control, any acceleration of vesting of options and shares triggered by the change of control ~~would have been deemed to~~will occur immediately prior to the change of control and Mr. ~~Walicek would~~DeBonis will have ~~received~~ a minimum of ~~three~~six months following the change of control to exercise ~~his newly-vested~~the options (or longer if a longer period would otherwise be applicable).

In the event ~~of an~~the involuntary termination occurs during the period ~~between~~that is from twelve ~~and~~(12) months after a change of control to twenty-four (24) months ~~following~~after a change of control (the ~~"Second Year"~~“Second Year”), Mr. DeBonis will be entitled to ~~the Walicek Employment Agreement provided for~~ the following benefits: (i) ~~severance pay consisting~~a lump sum cash payment equal to his base salary in effect at, and his target bonus applicable to the calendar year of, the ~~higher~~involuntary termination or change of ~~Mr. Walicek's annual base salary then~~control, whichever is greater, multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months remaining in ~~effect for~~the Second Year and the denominator of which is twelve ~~months, or $325,000;~~(12), (ii) ~~severance pay consisting of the higher of Mr. Walicek's actual target bonus for the then-current year, or $325,000; (iii)~~ accelerated vesting of all outstanding stock options ~~and RSU awards that are outstanding and~~granted to Mr. DeBonis by the Company prior to the change of control that would have otherwise vested after termination during the remaining number of whole months in the Second Year; and ~~(iv) payment~~(iii) the same level of ~~Mr. Walicek's COBRA~~Company-paid health ~~insurance premiums~~coverage and benefits at the levels in effect on the day preceding his termination for ~~twelve months.~~the number of whole months remaining in the Second Year.

In the event of an ~~involuntary~~involuntarily termination apart from a change of control, ~~the Walicek Employment Agreement provided for~~Mr. DeBonis would receive the same cash severance ~~pay for salary~~ and ~~bonus and~~health benefits as if the ~~same COBRA benefit~~termination occurred within six months prior to, or within twelve (12) months following, a change of control, as is described above, but ~~did not provide for any~~will only receive accelerated ~~equity vesting.~~vesting in those outstanding stock options that would otherwise have vested during the twelve (12) months following such termination. In this event, the benefits would be calculated as if the date of the change of control were the same as the date of the involuntarily termination.

The Walicek Employment Agreement required us to provide thirty days’ advance notice to Mr. Walicek in the event of any termination without “cause” (as defined in the Walicek Employment Agreement. In the event the severance benefits under the DeBonis Severance Agreement would be treated as excess parachute payments subject to excise taxes, the benefits would either be reduced to a level that would not trigger the excise taxes or would be paid in full, whichever ~~resulted~~results in Mr. ~~Walicek~~DeBonis retaining a greater benefit on an after-tax basis.

~~The Walicek Separation Agreement~~

Mr. Walicek, our former President and CEO, resigned from his position as President and CEO and member of the Board, effective as of the close of business February 1, 2016. In connection with this transition, the Company and Mr. Walicek entered into the Walicek Separation Agreement. Pursuant to the Walicek Separation Agreement, Mr. Walicek is entitled to receive severance pay equal to $700,000, pay in lieu of thirty days’ advance notice of termination that is equal to $31,250, payment of COBRA health insurance premiums for twelve months and the opportunity to vest with respect to the 72,600 RSUs otherwise scheduled to vest February 15, 2016 over a six-month consulting service period from February 2016 through July 2016. The Walicek Separation Agreement also provides, among other things, for transition consulting services from Mr. Walicek, a general release of claims against us and our affiliates from Mr. Walicek and a mutual non-disparagement covenant. The Walicek Separation Agreement differed from the benefits provided under the Walicek Employment Agreement in case of involuntary termination apart from a change of control in that severance pay equaled $700,000 rather than $750,000 and an opportunity was provided to vest in certain RSUs during the post-employment consulting period.

Change of Control Severance Agreement with Steven Moore

On May 11, 2009, the Company entered into a ~~separate~~ Change of Control Severance Agreement with Mr. Moore, as further amended on February 22, 2012 and again on May 20, 2014. (The foregoing agreement and amendments are referred to as the ~~"Severance~~"Moore Severance Agreement"). The Moore Severance Agreement provides for certain benefits in the event of his “involuntary termination.” An “involuntary termination” is a termination by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Moore for a “good reason event” (as each of those terms is defined in the Moore Severance Agreement).

In the event the involuntary termination occurs within six months prior to, or within twelve (12) months following, a “change of control” (as such term is defined in the Moore Severance Agreement), Mr. Moore will be entitled to the following benefits: (i) a lump sum cash payment equal to twelve (12) months of his base salary and the then-current year's target bonus as in effect as of the date of such involuntary termination or, if greater, as in effect immediately prior to the change of control; (ii) accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards granted to him by the Company prior to the change of control; and (iii) the same level of Company-paid health coverage and benefits at the levels in effect on the day preceding the termination of Mr. Moore until the earlier of when he (and any eligible dependents) is no longer eligible to receive continuation coverage pursuant to COBRA, or twelve (12) months from the date of termination. In the event of an involuntary termination that occurs within six months prior to a change of control, any acceleration of vesting of options and shares triggered by the change of control will occur immediately prior to the change of control and Mr. Moore will have a minimum of six months following the change of control to exercise the options (or longer if a longer period would otherwise be applicable).

In the event the involuntary termination occurs during the Second Year following a change of control, Mr. Moore will be entitled to the following benefits: (i) a lump sum cash payment equal to his per month base salary in effect at the time of termination, or if greater, at the time of the change of control, multiplied by the number of whole months remaining in the Second Year after the termination occurs; (ii) a lump sum cash payment equal to one-twelfth of the then current year's target bonus as in effect at the time of termination, or if greater, at the time of the change of control, multiplied by the number of whole months remaining in the Second Year after the termination occurs; (iii) accelerated vesting of all outstanding stock options granted to Mr. Moore by the Company prior to the change of control that would have otherwise vested after termination during the remaining number of whole months in the Second Year; and (iv) the same level of Company-paid health coverage and benefits at the levels in effect on the day preceding his termination for the number of whole months remaining in the Second Year.

In the event of an involuntarily termination apart from a change of control, Mr. Moore would receive the same cash severance and health benefits as if the termination occurred within six months prior to, or within twelve months following, a change of control, as described above, but will only receive accelerated vesting in those outstanding stock options that would otherwise have vested during the twelve months following such termination. In this event, the benefits would be calculated as if the date of the change of control were the same as the date of the involuntarily termination.

In the event the severance benefits under the Severance Agreement would be treated as excess parachute payments subject to excise taxes, the benefits would either be reduced to a level that would not trigger the excise taxes or would be paid in full, whichever results in Mr. Moore retaining a greater benefit on an after-tax basis.

~~Change of Control and Severance Agreement with Todd A. DeBonis~~

On January 4, 2016, the Company entered into a separate Change of Control and Severance Agreement with Todd A. DeBonis (the "DeBonis Severance Agreement"). The DeBonis Severance Agreement provides for certain benefits in the event of Mr. DeBonis’ “involuntary termination.” An “involuntary termination” is a termination by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. DeBonis for “good reason” (as each of those terms is defined in the DeBonis Severance Agreement).

In the event the involuntary termination occurs within six months prior to, or within twelve months following, a “change of control” (as such term is defined in the DeBonis Severance Agreement), Mr. DeBonis will be entitled to the following benefits: (i) a lump sum cash payment equal to twelve months of his base salary and the then-current year's target bonus as in effect as of the date of such involuntary termination or, if greater, as in effect immediately prior to the change of control; (ii) accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards granted to him by the Company prior to the change of control; and (iii) the same level of Company-paid health coverage and benefits at the levels in effect on the day preceding the termination of Mr. DeBonis until the earlier of when he (and any eligible dependents) is no longer eligible to receive continuation coverage pursuant to COBRA, or twelve months from the date of termination. In the event of an involuntary termination that occurs within six months prior to a change of control, any acceleration of vesting of options and shares triggered by the change of control will occur immediately prior to the change of control and Mr. DeBonis will have a minimum of six months following the change of control to exercise the options (or longer if a longer period would otherwise be applicable).

~~In the event the involuntary termination occurs during the period that is from twelve~~ (12) months after a change of control to twenty-four (24) months after a change of control (the “Second Year”), Mr. DeBonis will be entitled to the following benefits: (i) a lump sum cash payment equal to his base salary in effect at, and his target bonus applicable to the calendar year of, the involuntary termination or change of control, whichever is greater, multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months remaining in the Second Year and the denominator of which is twelve (12), (ii) accelerated vesting of all outstanding stock options granted to Mr. DeBonis by the Company prior to the change of control that would have otherwise vested after termination during the remaining number of whole months in the Second Year; and (iii) the same level of Company-paid health coverage and benefits at the levels in effect on the day preceding his termination for the number of whole months remaining in the Second Year.

In the event of an involuntarily termination apart from a change of control, Mr. DeBonis would receive the same cash severance and health benefits as if the termination occurred within six months prior to, or within twelve months following, a change of control, as described above, but will only receive accelerated vesting in those outstanding stock options that would otherwise have vested during the twelve (12) months following such termination. In this event, the benefits would be calculated as if the date of the change of control were the same as the date of the involuntarily termination.

In the event the severance benefits under the Moore Severance Agreement would be treated as excess parachute payments subject to excise taxes, the benefits would either be reduced to a level that would not trigger the excise taxes or would be paid in full, whichever results in Mr. ~~DeBonis~~Moore retaining a greater benefit on an after-tax basis.

The Walicek Separation Agreement

41Mr. Walicek, our former President and CEO, resigned from his position as President and CEO and member of the Board, effective as of the close of business February 1, 2016. In connection with this transition, the Company and Mr. Walicek entered into the Separation and Consulting Agreement dated February 1, 2016 (the "Walicek Separation Agreement"). Pursuant to the Walicek Separation Agreement, Mr. Walicek received severance pay equal to $700,000 (which is equivalent to the sum of one year of Mr. Walicek’s annual base salary and his termination-based target bonus), pay in lieu of thirty days’ advance notice of termination that is equal to $31,250, payment of COBRA health insurance premiums for twelve (12) months and the opportunity to vest with respect to the 72,600 RSUs otherwise scheduled to vest February 15, 2016 over a six-month consulting service period from February 2016 through July 2016. The Walicek Separation Agreement also provides, among other things, for transition consulting services from Mr. Walicek, a general release of claims against us and our affiliates from Mr. Walicek and a mutual non-disparagement covenant.

Total Benefits Potentially Payable

The following table summarizes benefits that would have been payable to the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 had they been involuntarily terminated or had a change of control and involuntary termination occurred as of that date:


	Involuntary termination not related to change in control ⁽¹⁾						Involuntary termination related to change in control ⁽²⁾						Involuntary termination not related to change in control						Involuntary termination related to change in control
	Estimated total value of cash payments ($)		Estimated total value of equity acceleration ($) ⁽³⁾		Estimated total value of health benefits continuation ($)		Estimated total value of cash payments ($)		Estimated total value of equity acceleration ($) ⁽⁴⁾		Estimated total value of health benefits continuation ($)		Estimated total value of cash payments ($)		Estimated total value of equity acceleration ($)⁽¹⁾		Estimated total value of health benefits continuation ($)		Estimated total value of cash payments ($)		Estimated total value of equity acceleration ($) ⁽²⁾		Estimated total value of health benefits continuation ($)
Bruce A. Walicek	$	750,000	$	—	$	32,413	$	750,000	$	780,013	$	32,413
Todd A. DeBonis													$	800,000	$	57,021	$	33,967	$	800,000	$	539,000	$	33,967
Steven L. Moore	412,500		—		32,413		412,500		442,513		32,413		412,500		—		25,356		412,500		285,740		25,356
Stephen L. Domenik ⁽³⁾													—		—		—		—		—		—
Bruce A. Walicek ⁽⁴⁾													731,250		146,289		32,390		—		—		—

(1)

The actual severance payable to Mr. Walicek pursuant to the Walicek Separation Agreement constituted $731,250 in cash severance and up to $32,413 in health benefits continuation. In addition, the Walicek Separation Agreement provided Mr. Walicek the opportunity to vest with respect to 72,600 RSUs (valued at $153,912 based on the $2.12 closing price per share of our common stock as of February 1, 2016, the date of the Walicek Separation Agreement) in exchange for six months of transition consulting services to us.


~~(2)~~	Estimated using the ~~$2.38~~$2.80 closing price of a share of our common stock on December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.


~~(3)~~	No severance for “Involuntary termination related to change in control” is payable to Mr. Walicek in light of his February 1, 2016 termination of employment, discussed above in further detail under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

~~(4)~~(2)

As noted above, the level of severance benefits in the context of a change of control depends on whether the involuntary termination occurs during the period six months prior to, or within twelve (12) months after, a change of control, or during the period twelve to twenty-four months after, a change of control. For purposes of this table, we have assumed that the involuntary termination occurred within six months prior to or twelve (12) months after the change in control. The value of such level of benefits was estimated using the ~~$2.38~~$2.80 closing price of a share of our common stock on December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.


(3)	No termination benefits were provided to Mr. Domenik upon his resignation.

(4)

The actual severance paid to Mr. Walicek pursuant to the Walicek Separation Agreement constituted $731,250 in cash severance and $32,390 in health benefits continuation. In addition, the Walicek Separation Agreement provided Mr. Walicek the opportunity to vest with respect to 72,600 RSUs (valued at $146,289 based on the closing price per share of our common stock as of each of the vest dates) in exchange for six months of transition consulting services to us.

OTHER BUSINESS

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board does not know of any other matters to be presented for action by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting. If, however, any other matters not now known are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, proxies held by the Board will be voted on such other matters as determined by a majority of the Board.

DATE FOR SUBMISSION OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

If a shareholder wishes to present a proposal to be included in the Company’s ~~2017~~2018 proxy statement, the proponent and the proposal must comply with the proxy proposal submission rules of the SEC. Any such proposal must be received by the Company no later than December ~~15, 2016.~~14, 2017. If the Company changes the date of its ~~2017~~2018 annual meeting by more than 30 days from the date of the ~~2016~~2017 annual meeting, the deadline is a reasonable time before the Company begins to print and send its proxy materials. Shareholders interested in submitting such a proposal are advised to contact knowledgeable counsel with regard to the detailed requirements of the applicable securities laws. The submission of a shareholder proposal does not guarantee that it will be included in the Company’s proxy statement.

Alternatively, under the Company’s Second Amended and Restated Bylaws, a proposal or nomination that a shareholder submits outside the processes of SEC Rule 14a-8 must be delivered to or mailed and received at the Company’s principal executive offices by the Secretary of the Company not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the date of the annual meeting. In the event we provide less than 60 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting, the shareholder proposal or nomination must be received not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which such notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. A shareholder’s submission must include certain specific information concerning the proposal or nominee, as the case may be, in accordance with the Second Amended and Restated Bylaws: (a) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting and reasons for conducting such business at the meeting; (b) the name and address, as they appear on our books, of the shareholder proposing such business; (c) the class and number of shares of our securities that are beneficially owned by the shareholder; (d) any material interest of the shareholder in such business; and (e) any other information that is required to be provided by such shareholder pursuant to proxy proposal submission rules of the SEC. The presiding officer of the meeting may refuse to acknowledge any matter not made in compliance with the foregoing procedure.

In relation to shareholder proposals and nominations, in certain instances the Company may exercise discretionary voting authority under proxies held by the Board. For instance, if the Company does not receive a shareholder proposal or nomination 60 days prior to the date of the annual meeting (or, in the event the Company provides less than 60 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting, the shareholder proposal or nomination is received later than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which such notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made), the Company may exercise discretionary voting authority under proxies held by the Board on such shareholder proposal. However, if the Company changes the date of its ~~2017~~2018 annual meeting by more than 30 days from the date of the ~~2016~~2017 annual meeting and the shareholder submits the proposal or nomination pursuant to Rule 14a-8, the Company may exercise discretionary voting authority if the proposal or nomination is not received in a reasonable time before the Company begins to print and send its proxy materials. In addition, even if the Company is notified of a shareholder proposal or nomination within the time requirements discussed above, if the shareholder does not comply with certain requirements of the Exchange Act, the Company may exercise discretionary voting authority under proxies held by the Board on such shareholder proposal or nomination if the Company includes advice in its proxy statement on the nature of the matter and how the Company intends to exercise its discretion to vote on the matter.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

We are required to file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. These filings are not deemed to be incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement. We make these filings available on our Internet website at www.pixelworks.com, free of charge, as soon as practicable after we electronically file such reports with the SEC. Additionally, the Company will provide, without charge, on the written request of any beneficial owner of shares of the Company’s common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, a copy of the Company’s Annual Report as filed with the SEC on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. Written requests should be mailed to Pixelworks, Inc., Attn: Secretary, 224 Airport Parkway, Ste. 400, San Jose, CA, 95110.



	BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

	~~Stephen L. Domenik~~Todd A. DeBonis
	~~Interim~~ President and Chief Executive Officer ~~(Principal~~ (Principal Executive Officer)

San Jose, California

April ~~14, 2016~~13, 2017



THE MEETING	1

PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS	4
INFORMATION ABOUT OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS	87

BOARD RESPONSIBILITIES	87
BOARD STRUCTURE	87
BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE	87
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	98
BOARD OVERSIGHT OF RISK	98
BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS	109
STANDING COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD	109
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION	1110
QUALIFICATIONS OF DIRECTORS	1211
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION	1211
COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD	1413
CODE OF ETHICS	1413

PROPOSAL NO. 2: APPROVAL OF AMENDED AND RESTATED 2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN	1413
INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS	2322

PROPOSAL NO. 3: RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM	2524
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES	2524
PRE-APPROVAL OF AUDIT AND PERMISSIBLE NON-AUDIT SERVICES	2524
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT	2624

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT	2726

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE	28

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS	28

~~PROPOSAL NO. 4: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~	30

INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS	3029

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT	3129
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	3129
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS	3129
NARRATIVE TO ~~2015~~2016 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE AND GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS	35
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE	35
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS — ~~2015~~2016	37
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT ~~2015~~2016 FISCAL YEAR-END	38
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED	3940
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL	3940

OTHER BUSINESS	43

DATE FOR SUBMISSION OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS	43

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION	44



			VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

	Pixelworks, Inc. c/o Broadridge PO Box 1342 Brentwood, NY 11717		ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
			VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 PM Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
			VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.



			PIXELWORKS, INC. PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF ~~SHARESHOLDERS~~SHAREHOLDERS MAY ~~11, 2016~~10, 2017 PROXY SOLICITED OF BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

	The undersigned hereby appoints ~~Stephen L. Domenik~~Todd A. DeBonis and Steven L. Moore proxies, with power of substitution to vote on behalf of the undersigned all shares that the undersigned may be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Pixelworks, Inc. on May ~~11, 2016~~10, 2017 and any adjournments thereof, with all powers that the undersigned would possess if personally present.

	Whether or not you expect to attend the annual meeting, please vote these shares.

	THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED "FOR" THE NOMINEES IN PROPOSAL 1, AND "FOR" PROPOSALS 2 3 AND 4.3. WHETHER OR NOT DIRECTION IS MADE, EACH OF THE PROXIES IS AUTHORIZED TO VOTE IN HIS DISCRETION ON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OR ANY SUCH ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT THEREOF.
			Address change / comments:




			(If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

			(Continued and to be signed on reverse side)



o	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))



o	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.



1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

5)	Total fee paid:



o	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.



1)	Amount Previously Paid:

2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

3)	Filing Party:

4)	Date Filed:


1.	To elect ~~six directors~~five Directors to serve until the ~~2017~~2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their successors are duly elected or qualified;


2.	To approve the amended and restated 2006 Stock Incentive Plan;


3.	To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as Pixelworks’ independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year; and


4.	~~To hold an advisory vote on executive compensation; and~~


5.	To transact any other business that properly comes before the meeting or any postponement or adjournment of the meeting.



Filed by the Registrant	x



o	Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12



x	No fee required.


1.	To vote using the proxy card, simply complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the envelope provided. If you return your signed proxy card to us before the Annual Meeting, we will vote your shares as you direct.


2.	To vote in person, come to the Annual Meeting and we will give you a ballot when you arrive.


3.	To vote over the telephone, dial toll-free (800) 690-6903 using a touch-tone phone and follow the recorded instructions. You will be asked to provide the control number from the enclosed proxy card. Your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time on May ~~10, 2016~~9, 2017 to be counted.


4.	To vote on the Internet, go to www.proxyvote.com to complete an electronic proxy card. You will be asked to provide the control number from the enclosed proxy card. Your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time on May ~~10, 2016~~9, 2017 to be counted.